Tag: Unemployment rate

Are We Better Off Than We Were Four Years Ago? – Colorado

horvath Leave a comment

This election season has featured an abundance of discussion about where the state is better off now than we were four years ago. In some cases, we are better off today and in other cases we are not.  The following data provides a snapshot of key metrics that fit into both categories.

Colorado Population
People like to visit and live in Colorado. Continued population growth is projected on a long-term basis.
• Although Net Migration has slowed, Colorado’s population continues to grow at a steady pace.
Colorado Employment and Unemployment
Increased population growth points to long-term job gains and lower employment.
• During the 69 months between January 2007 and September 2012 Colorado only gained jobs in 34 months (seasonally adjusted data).
• In 2012, Colorado employment is well below employment of 2007 and 2008, but it is trending upwards.
• In 2012, jobs are being added at a faster rate than they were in 2008, but not 2007.
• The number of unemployed workers is more than twice as much in 2012 as it was in 2007. It is also greater than 2008.
• The unemployment rate in 2012 is twice the 2007 rate and much higher than in 2008.
• In 2012, the unemployment rate and the number of unemployed workers is trending downward, whereas, it was trending upward in 2008.

Colorado Employment by Sector
Segments of the economy are healthier than they were in 2008.
• Projected annual state employment for 2012 will be about 56,900 less than the total for 2008. The following sectors have greater 2012 employment than 2008: Private Education and Health Care, Higher Education, Tourism, K-12 Education, Corporate Headquarters (MCE), Federal Government, Employment Services, State Government, Extractive Industries, and Professional and Scientific and Technical Services.
Colorado Job Creation
Improved firm and job creation is necessary if the economy is to recover at a faster rate.
• Gross job losses and job gains for 2011 are less than 2008. Improvement in net job gains is more a result of decreased layoffs than actual job creation.

Income and Wages
Recent wage and income data is mixed.
• Per Capita Personal Income – The 2011 average is slightly below the value for 2008.
• Colorado Median Household Income – The 2011 median is below the value for 2008.
• Average Annual Wages – The 2011 average is above the value for 2008.

Colorado Output
Increased employment and wages will point to increased demand for goods and services. This in turn will push output upwards.
• Colorado Real GDP was greater than the U.S. for 2007 to 2011.
• The following sectors have shown steady growth since 1997 and 2011 output is greater than 2007 and 2008: Retail Trade; Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services; Health Care; Finance and Insurance; and Information.
• Real output for the Construction sector was greater in 2007 and 2008 than 2011 for both Colorado and the U.S.

Colorado and Inflation
Overall inflation has been minimal; however, inflation in key areas has been noticeable.
• Overall inflation has been minimal since the beginning of the Great Recession. Apparel and Housing are the only sectors that have grown at a lower rate than All Items for Coloradans.
Construction and Housing
There is improvement in the Construction and Housing markets.
• The number of permits in 2012 is greater than 2008, although they are well below the levels shown in the 2000s.  Most importantly, permits are slowly trending upwards.
• 2012 Colorado housing prices are approaching 2008 levels.
• Home ownership rates in 2011 are below the rates in 2008. More importantly, they are trending downwards.

General Fund and Retail Trade Sales
Gross General Fund Revenue is trending upwards because of stronger job gains (income taxes) and retail trade sales (sales taxes).
• Retail Sales are improving. Projected Sales Tax Revenue for the fiscal year ending June 2013 will exceed revenue for FYE 2008 (not adjusted for inflation). This tax accounts for about one-fourth of Gross General Fund Revenue.
• Projected Net Individual Income Tax for the fiscal year ending June 2012 will exceed FYE 2008 (not adjusted for inflation). This tax accounts for about two-thirds of Gross General Fund Revenue.
• Projected General Fund Revenue for the fiscal year ending June 2012 will match FYE 2008 (not adjusted for inflation).

For more detailed analysis of the state of the economy compared to four years ago, visit https://cber.co or click here.

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Most Recent Labor Report Not What Incumbents Want to Hear

horvath Leave a comment

The October 5th Bureau of Labor Statistics press release was disappointing, particularly for incumbents in the upcoming elections. The report indicated that the U.S. added only 114,000 nonfarm jobs in September. It stated, “Employment increased in health care and in transportation and warehousing but changed little in most other major industries.” While job creation is important, the expansion of these industries does little to create jobs in other sectors.

The recent update also indicated that there are 12 million Americans out of work. Four years ago that number was 9.5 million and 6 years ago it was 6.8 million. The fact that the unemployment rate edged downward to 7.8% seems somewhat irrelevant given this data.

The data can be looked at from a slightly different perspective. That view indicates that the nation has regained about half the jobs lost as a result of the Great Recession. Ugh!

The private sector added 104,000 jobs for the month, while government employment added 10,000 workers. This is the second month in a row for increased government employment. While some have an unfavorable view of job gains in the public sector, in this case, it may be a positive indicator that state and local revenue streams have improved.

The BLS announcement was preceded by the ADP employment report which stated that private nonfarm employment had risen by 162,000 in September, 189,000 in August, and 156,000 in July. At this point, ADP is clearly more optimistic about the recovery than the BLS.

On average, Colorado nonfarm employment comprises about 1.72% of the U.S. total. If Colorado grows at the same pace as the U.S., the state data will gain about 2,000 jobs in September. We’ll see what BLS says in their monthly update on October 19th.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

National Jobs Data Continues to Disappoint

horvath Leave a comment

The September 7th Bureau of Labor Statistics press release created an uproar with the announcement that the U.S. added only 96,000 net jobs in August. This “anemic” job creation was accompanied by a downward revision in the July data from 22,000 to 141,000.

The private sector added 103,000 jobs for the month. This means government employment declined by 7,000 workers.

The report came on the heels of the ADP employment report which stated that private nonfarm employment had risen by 201,000 in August and July private sector employment had been revised upward by 10,000. Clearly, the two reports on the same topic tell two distinct stories.

At the same time BLS national unemployment slipped to 8.1%. The decline is relatively insignificant.

Of greater concern than the numbers is the impact the current economic conditions are having on the culture in the American workforce. While it is common for workers to feel like they are not valued or part of the decision making process, those feelings are exacerbated during the current economic environment.

Deborah Brackney, Vice President of the Mountain States Employers Council, recently said in an interview with 9News that “Anywhere from 50-60 percent of employees right now say that if they could find another job, they would leave their current employer.” She also added that a recent Gallup poll shows that only 30 percent of employees are engaged in the workplace. Lost productivity associated with this lack of involvement in the company is approximately $300 billion. A critical source of the problem is the lack of communications in the workplace.

In other words, the impacts of the Great Recession have touched both unemployed and employed workers in significant ways.

On average, Colorado nonfarm employment is about 1.72% of the U.S. total. If Colorado grows at the same pace as the U.S. the state data will reflect a gain of about 1,650 jobs. We’ll see what BLS says on September 21.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Unemployment Isn’t the Same for Everybody

horvath Leave a comment

This past month Coloradans took special notice when the unemployment rate was announced because it matched the U.S. rate. The July seasonally adjusted rate for both was 8.3%.

In July, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that there were 13.4 million unemployed Americans, based on the non-seasonally adjusted rate (NAR) of 8.6%. This is slightly higher than the more frequently publicized seasonally adjusted rate (SAR) of 8.3%.

A closer look at the data shows distinct differences based on demographics and geography.

Gender
• 6.9 million men unemployed with a NAR of 8.2%.
• 6.5 million women unemployed with a NAR of 9.0%.

Race
• .5 million unemployed Asians with a NAR of 6.2%.
• 9.5 million unemployed Whites with a NAR of 7.6%.
• 2.8 million unemployed African-Americans with a NAR of 15.0%.

Ethnic Origins
• 2.5 million unemployed Latinos with a NAR of 10.3%.

Age Groups
• 4.0 million unemployed, 16-24 years old, with a NAR of 17.1%.
• 2.8 million unemployed, 25-34 years old, with a NAR of 8.3%.
• 2.2 million unemployed, 35-44 years old, with a NAR of 6.8%.
• 2.3 million unemployed, 45-54 years old, with a NAR of 6.6%.
• 1.5 million unemployed, 55-64 years old, with a NAR of 6.3%.
• .5 million unemployed, 65+ years old, with a NAR of 7.2%.

Marital Status
• 4.4 million unemployed married people, spouse present with a NAR of 5.4%.
Despite a steady recovery, there are segments of the population that have not found jobs.

Geographic rates are available for Colorado. In July both the NAR and SAR were coincidently 8.3%.

Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)
• The NARs for the Boulder and Fort Collins MSAs were less than 8.3%
• The NAR for the Denver-Aurora-Broomfield MSA was 8.3%.
• The NARs for the Pueblo, Colorado Springs, Greeley, and Grand Junction MSAs were greater than 8.3%.

Counties (Most recent data is June 2012).
• Colorado has 64 counties, 25 have NARs greater than the state average and 1 has a NAR equal to the state rate.

• Seventeen of Colorado’s counties are part of the MSAs. Seven of the 17 have NARs greater than the state average.
• Of the 47 rural counties, 28 have NARs less than the state average, 1 has a rate equal to the state NAR, and 18 have NARs below the state average.
• Most of the rural counties with higher than average unemployment rates are on the Western Slope or the south/southwest part of the state.

Cities with populations greater than 25,000 people (Most recent data is June 2012).
• The NARs for Arvada, Boulder, Broomfield, Castle Rock, Fort Collins, Lafayette, Longmont, Loveland, Parker, and Westminster were less than 8.3%
• The NAR for Lakewood was 8.3%.
• The NARs for Aurora, Brighton, Centennial, Colorado Springs, Commerce City, Denver, Englewood, Fountain, Grand Junction, Greeley, Northglenn, Pueblo, Thornton, and Wheat Ridge.

While the state has been steadily adding jobs for two years, there are clearly parts of the state where the economy has not recovered.

For additional information on the Colorado go to https://cber.co/CBEReconomy.html.

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Colorado Unemployment Rate Up for Fourth Month in a Row

horvath Leave a comment

The Colorado unemployment rate rose for the fourth consecutive month and reached 8.3%. While the BLS indicated that this increase was not statistically significant, it is certainly significant to incumbents seeking re-election in November.

The unemployment rate is a metric that the public pays attention to. They view it as a sign that the economy is not improving – as promised. Specifically, more than 225,000 people are unemployed in Colorado.  The never-ending talk about the fiscal cliff, additional easing by the Federal Reserve, and other doom and gloom projections add to the concerns of the electorate and the woes of incumbents.
The increase to 8.3% is significant for another reason. This is the second consecutive month that the state unemployment rate has matched the U.S. Over the past decade, the Colorado rate has often been a half to a full point lower than the U.S. rate. Seldom has Colorado’s rate been equal to or higher than the nation.

The basic reason for the rise in the rate is that the size of the labor pool increased. In other words, a greater number of people began looking for jobs. Even though the public and private sector have been adding jobs for the past two years, they aren’t being added fast enough to absorb all of the interested workers.

On a positive note, initial job claims are declining. That means there are fewer layoffs.

Continuing claims are also trending downwards – ever so slowly. That means people are either finding work or their benefits have expired. The former is a positive sign, while the latter is not.

The most recent data release shows that after seven months, an average of 40,000 jobs have been added, or about 3,300 jobs per month. Two factors could cause 2012 employment to be less than 2011 (Last year the state added 33,000 jobs).

BLS periodically and systematically revises the unemployment and employment data. Revisions to the data could push the 2012 total downward (an upward revision is unlikely).

As well, there could be a downturn in employment. If employment drops to a monthly average of 23,000 for the last five months then the annual total would be 33,000, or the same as 2011.

The good news is that gross job losses appear have declined, there has been a slight increase in gross job gains, and more people are looking for work. While this scenario is not ideal, it is much better than having a rise in the unemployment rate caused by a drop off in gross job gains and an uptick in gross job losses.

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

U.S. Employment Situation Improves

horvath Leave a comment

The Bureau of Labor Statistics recently announced that wage and salary payrolls added 200,000 workers in December. This means that about 133,000 net jobs were added on a monthly basis in 2011. There was marked improvement as the year progressed, as about 143,000 jobs were added a month for the last 6 months of the year. Sectors adding jobs were transportation and warehousing, retail trade, manufacturing, health care, and the extractive industries.

This rate of growth has been sufficient to gradually reduce the unemployment rate, which reached 8.5% in December. It is necessary to add about 225,000 jobs a month on a sustained basis to lower unemployment significantly.

There are about 13.1 million unemployed workers. Most likely that number understates the severity of the situation as it does not include discouraged workers or those who did not want to deal with the hassles of seeking unemployment.

It is important to note that 5.6 million have been without work for 27 months. (Keep in mind the total number of unemployed people in January of 2001 was 6.0 million people).

The jobless rates for men (8.0%) and women (7.9%) are similar, while teenagers come in at 23.1%. The Asian population has the lowest unemployment rate at 6.8%, followed closely by whites at 7.5%. Hispanics have a jobless rate of 11.0% and blacks register 15.8%.

The Q4 preliminary Real GDP report is scheduled to be released in the latter part of January and is expected to be in the 2.5% to 3.0% range, a marked increase from the first part of the year. The combination of improved output and the increase in the number of jobs added bodes well (but not great) for 2012.

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Economy Struggles as Debt Ceiling Debate Nears “Deadline”

horvath Leave a comment

As the August 2 “deadline” for the debt ceiling approaches there is an abundance of articles, discussions, blogs, and editorials discussing the future of the economy. Most are dismal.

Housing – In 50 words or less, the housing market is dismal. Gary Shilling, Forbes economist, says it will drop another 20% next year. While that may not be the case in many locations, it is unlikely that Colorado will see appreciation in housing prices next year. Time, not stimulus, is the solution to the problem. Unfortunately this points to continued budget woes for schools, special districts, and local governments.

The 2012 Elections – Part of the posturing related to the debt ceiling debate has been centered around the creation of sound bites for the 2012 election. Get your wading boots on for a campaign season that will make previous ones look like a walk in the park. The advertisements and campaign speeches for the upcoming elections are likely to leave the electorate with even greater angst for our elected officials.

Investment Options are LImited – QE2 propped up the stock market for a few months, and temporarily raised consumer confidence. For the near-term, interest rates are miniscule, return on investments are low, commodity prices have fallen off. Did we mention that the housing market has tanked? There are few investment options for consumers.

Fuel Prices, One Example of Inflation – Fed Chairman Bernanke was correct when he said that the price of oil would drop. He forgot to mention that it would occur at summer’s end and it would be accompanied by a decline in the price of other commodities. The price for a tank of gas remains well above $60. Gasoline prices are just one example of inflation that will constrain consumer confidence in the months ahead.

China – The Chinese economy remains strong, but it is slowing. As their consumption decreases, there will be a corresponding decline in the demand for American goods. Like it or not, we are in a global economy and the expansion of U.S. output hinges on foreign consumption.

Unemployment Rate – In Colorado the rate has declined, which is good news. Unfortunately, there are about 230,000 people who are still not working. This is a double whammy. They are receiving financial assistance to reduce their chances of becoming destitute and they have reduced their consumption. As well, older workers are remaining in the workforce because of uncertainty about such federal assistance programs as Medicare and Social Security. This has reduced job opportunities for younger workers, which has multiple negative implications on future economic growth.

At times the dismal news makes it sound like the world is coming to an end tomorrow, fortunately that is not the case. As bad as the economy may seem, the country remains in a growth mode (barely). Despite our current economic and political challenges, the U.S. and Colorado continue to be a great place to live, work, and play.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Gap between U.S. and Colorado Unemployment Widens

horvath Leave a comment

The Colorado economy is a lot like the final two weeks of the 2010 Colorado Rockies baseball season – very ugly.

On a positive note, the word on the street is that both are going to be better in the near term (despite at opening day loss in extra innings).

On March 25, the Colorado Office of Labor Market Information (LMI) announced that the statewide seasonally adjusted unemployment rate had risen to 9.3% in February (the non-seasonally adjusted rate was 9.7%). By comparison, the national seasonally adjusted rate dropped further to 8.9%. Prior to January, the last time Colorado’s rate was higher than the U.S. was September 2005.

Seasonally adjusted unemployment rates for the state’s Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) are:
• Boulder  7.3%
• Fort Collins 7.9%
• Denver 9.4%
• Colorado Springs 10.1%
• Greeley 10.7%
• Grand Junction 11.0%
• Pueblo 11.1%.
These metros areas account for about 86% of the Colorado labor force. A majority of the state MSAs have unemployment at or above 9.4%.

There is more to the story…

Through February, year over year, seasonally adjusted data points to weak employment gains of 13,800 workers.

The areas of net job growth are:
• 11,400  Private education and health care
• 8,200  Tourism
• 8,200  Professional business services
• 2,200  Trade, transportation, and utilities
• 2,100  Oil, gas, and mineral extraction
• 800  Personal services
Employment in these 6 sectors is about 63% of all workers and 57.3% of total wages. The increase is about 32,900 workers.

The areas with continued declines are:
• -8,900 Construction
• -3,900 Financial Activities
• -3,200 Information
• -2,600 Government
• -500 Manufacturing
These 5 sectors have shown losses of 19,100.

It is good news that there is an increase in net jobs; however, there are 3 areas of concern:
• The weak level of net job growth is being driven by a reduction in job losses rather than a significant increase in job gains.
• Many of the jobs that are being added are not primary jobs.
• Many of the jobs being added pay lower wages and have less on an impact on the economy.

So, are we headed for continued improvement and another Roctober or lackluster economic growth and another October watching other teams play in the World Series? A few months from now we will have a much better idea where the economy and Rockies are headed.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Colorado Legislative Council – Outlook for the State Improving

horvath Leave a comment

The Colorado Legislative Council (CLC) recently released its quarterly update of the state economy Focus Colorado: Economic and Revenue Forecast. The report was released in mid-March, at a time when it appears that Q1 2011 employment will be approximately 15,000 jobs higher than Q1 2010. It is great to hear that net employment is again trending upward; however, state employment remains below the peak 2001.

Increased employment is good news for the state coffers!

The Q4 2010 forecast pointed to a budget shortfall of $1,015 million. Because Colorado is required to have a balanced budget, it became necessary to significantly reduce spending for K-12 education and other programs.

Over the past year, there has been an increase in consumption and private sector employment that now appears to be sustainable, hence justification for adjusting the revenue forecast  upward. Projections for FY 2010-11 were raised by $116 million, while revenues for the subsequent two years were upped by $99 million and $105 million respectively.

The combination of budget cuts and revenue increases point to a much lower projected shortfall, $450 million, for FY-2011-12. This is good news, but…

Nationally, CLC is calling for real GDP growth of 3.2%, similar to Q4 2010. After three years of net job losses, employment will increase by 0.4% to about 130.3 million jobs. Unfortunately, average annual unemployment for the year will be 8.7%.

At the state level, CLC projects population growth of 1.6% or about 78,000 people. This reflects a reduction in net in-migration to less than 40,000.

Wage and salary employment will post gains of 0.7%, or about 16,000 workers. While this growth is encouraging, it is not enough to significantly lower the rate of unemployment. Unemployment of 8.8% will be slightly higher than the national rate.

Retail sales are projected to record gains of 4.2%; however, inflation (2.3%), will account for more than half of that gain. Retailers will remain challenged to maintain profitability. Finally, single family building permits will be 15,300, slightly higher than in 2010.

The risks to continued growth remain significant. Consumer confidence is fragile and talk about a double-dip has resurfaced. Constraints facing Colorado include a painfully slow housing recovery, rising food and energy prices, and continued concerns about the banking system.

While the picture painted by CLC is certainly not a bright one, it is clearly much more encouraging.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Colorado Unemployment Rate Tops the U.S.

horvath Leave a comment

On March 10th, the Colorado Office of Labor Market Information (LMI) announced that the statewide seasonally adjusted unemployment rate reached 9.1% in January. By comparison, the national rate dropped to 9.0%. The last time Colorado’s rate was higher than the U.S. was September 2005.

These results are further indication that the state is lagging the nation in its recovery. Over the past year, the
national rate has declined, while the state rate has increased slightly.

A review of the 64 counties shows that 35 have a rate less than the state (9.9% non-seasonally adjusted). In
several counties with small labor forces there is unemployment of about 20%. In other words, both urban and rural counties have not been spared.

Colorado has 7 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) that cover 17 counties and account for 86% of the labor force. The unemployment rate (non seasonally adjusted) in 9 counties is less than the rate for the state.

A review of unemployment rates by MSA shows that the Denver-Aurora is the same as the state, whereas Boulder-Longmont and Fort Collins-Loveland fall below the state. The remaining four MSAs have rates (Greeley, Pueblo,Colorado Springs, and Grand Junction) above the state.

In addition, Colorado has seven Micropolitan Statistical Areas (MCAs) that cover 8 counties. About 5.5% of the
labor force works in these locales.

Five of the seven MCAs have unemployment lower than the state average (Durango, Edwards, Fort Morgan, Silverthorne, and Sterling). On the other hand, unemployment in Canon City and Montrose is well above the state average.Unemployment in 5 of the 8 counties is below 9.9%. In the remaining 39 rural counties, 21 had unemployment rates lower than 9.9%.

The aggregate rate of unemployment was greatest in the MSAs (9.94%), followed by the MCAs (9.70%), and the rural counties (9.58%). About one-third of the counties have unemployment below 8.0%.

On a more positive note, limited job creation began in the second quarter of 2010. If that growth continues, the state rate is likely to follow the national trend, and decline as the year progresses.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.