Tag: US economy

Policy and Prices Impact Output for Extractive Industries – Is Colorado Closed for Business?

horvath

The extractive industries are an important and visible part of Colorado’s economy. In 2012, Colorado’s GDP was 1.76% of the U.S. GDP and Colorado’s Mining sector output was 3.58% of the U.S. Mining sector output.  In other words, Colorado’s extractive industries critical components of both the state and the national economy.

Between 1997 and 2012, there were stark differences in the state and national output for the extractive industries and the private sector.

  • The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.3% and the extractive industries were -0.6%.
  • The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 3.1% and the extractive industries grew at a rate of 3.6%.

Nationally sector output trended downward from 1997 to 2005 and trended upward from 2005 to 2009. Between 2009 and 2012, sector output trended downward again.

In Colorado sector output  trended upward from 1997 to 2009; however, it has trended downward since 2009.

  • The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.5% and extractive industry output was -2.0%.
  • The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 2.2% and extractive industry output was -4.0%.

The variance in output has been caused by changes in prices, supply and demand, and policy. Recently, the latter has had the most detrimental impact on the industry in Colorado.  Policy and anti-fracking efforts are likely to further suppress output in the months ahead. In addition to reducing output, this will create the perception that Colorado is not a business-friendly state.


©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Will Colorado Output Continue to Expand as Slower Rate than U.S.?

horvath

Between 1997 and 2012, the Private Sector Real GDP and job growth for Colorado outpaced the nation.  For this period, data released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows:

  • The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.3% and private sector wage and salary employment expanded at a rate of 0.5%.
  • The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 3.1% and private sector nonfarm jobs grew at a rate of 0.9%.

More recently, the data tells a different story.  Colorado did not fare as well as the nation between 2009 and 2012.  While the rate of job growth was similar, U.S. output expanded at a faster rate.

  • The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.5% and private sector wage and salary employment expanded at a rate of 1.1%.
  • The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 2.2% and private sector nonfarm jobs grew at a rate of 1.1%.

Time will tell whether the Colorado output will continue to grow at a slower rate than the U.S. or if this is a short-term variance that will reverse itself in 2013 or 2014.

Private Sector Real GDP
©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

State Per Capita Real GDP Increased by 1.1% Since 1997

horvath

There are many data sets that can be used to evaluate the performance of the state and national economy. One of those metrics is Per Capita Real GDP. This measure is derived by dividing real output by the population.

For the period 1997 to 2012, Per Capita Real GDP for Colorado and the U.S. grew at essentially the same rate, 1.11% and 1.13% respectively.

Within that period there were some differences:

  •  Between 1997 and 2001 the Per Capita Real GDP for Colorado increased at an annualized rate of  3.88% compared to 2.49% for the U.S.
  •  Between 2001 and 2012 the Per Capita Real GDP for Colorado increased at an annualized rate of  0.13% compared to 0.64% for the U.S.
  • Between 2009 and 2012 the Per Capita Real GDP for Colorado grew at an annualized rate of 0.58% compared to 1.39% for the U.S.

During the final years of the go-go 90s, Per Capita Real GDP for the state increased at a faster rate than the nation.  Since the 2001 recession, the nation has outpaced the state.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Tepid Job Growth Continues

horvath

When the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced (June 7th) that 175,000 jobs were added in May the stock market rose by 200+ points.  While the number of jobs added in May exceeded expectations, a significant downward revision in April offset those gains.

Said differently, the number of jobs added in May was comparable to the monthly average for 2011.  It is difficult to explain how that level of job growth could drive the market up.

The good news is that jobs are being added at a steady, albeit tepid pace.

On average, the U.S. has added 189,200 jobs per month in 2013. This compares to +185,000 workers in 2012 and +175,000 workers in 2011.  In other words, job growth continues to be lackluster, but well above the average for 2010 (+85,000) and 2009 (-421,000).

At this rate, U.S. employment will return to the 2008 peak some time in 2014.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Large Establishments Have Added More Workers than Small Establishments Since End of Recession

horvath

The latest ADP data shows that large companies (500+ workers) have added more private sector jobs than small companies (fewer than 20 workers) since the end of the recession.  More specifically,

  • Employment at establishments with fewer than 20 workers is 25.9% of total private sector employment. These establishments have accounted for 18.7% of total jobs added, or 1.0 million jobs.
  • Employment at establishments with 20 to 499 workers is 51.6% of total employment. These establishments have accounted for 53.6% of total jobs added, or 3.0 million jobs.
  • Employment at establishments with 500+ workers is 22.5% of total employment. These establishments have accounted for 27.7% of total jobs added, or 1.5 million jobs.

Since the end of the recession, 5.5 million private sector jobs have been added.

Since the series began in 2005, the small companies have added more workers than the large companies. More specifically,

  • Employment at establishments with fewer than 20 workers has increased by 1.9 million workers.
  • Employment at establishments with 20 to 499 workers has increased by 1.8 million.
  • Employment at establishments with 500+ workers has decreased by 1.1 million.

Private sectors jobs have increased by 2.6 million since the beginning of 2005.

Over the past 8 years, the small, medium, and large establishments have contributed to the economy in different ways.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Recovery from Recession Led by Large Companies

horvath

Large and small companies have had different employment patterns over the past 7-8 years.

According to employment data produced by ADP, about 17.6% of total private sector workers were employed at small companies, those with 1 to 19 workers, in January 2005. Companies with 500+ workers accounted for 17.1% of private sector employment.

Between 2005 and April 2013 the small companies expanded at a faster rate. The most recent ADP data shows the smaller companies currently account for 18.3% of private sector workers and the larger companies account for 15.9%.

The small companies had the least number of workers in January 2005. Jobs were added until July 2008, when they peaked. Employment tapered off slowly until December 2010. The number of jobs has been on the rise since.

Employment at larger companies increased slowly from January 2005 until March 2006. At that time employment began to taper off and declined for six years. Steady increases have occurred since March 2010.

The Great Recession officially ended in June 2009. Since then the small companies have added about 1.03 million workers and the large companies have added about 1.58 million.  In other words, large companies have played a greater role in the recovery than the small companies.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Data Not Clear About Whether Colorado is Outperforming the Nation in the Recovery

horvath

The wage and salary data produced by BLS shows that Colorado has recovered about 67% of jobs lost as a result of the Great Recession compared to 51% for the U.S.

The LAUS data also produced by BLS tells a much different story.

The Colorado LAUS Data shows that between the 2008 peak and the 2010 trough, Colorado lost more than 135,000 jobs. As of October 2012, the state had recovered only 26% of these jobs.

From October 2011 to October 2012, the LAUS data reports that the number of employed in Colorado has increased by 4,700. Over the past year, state CES employment has increased by 41,600 (NSA) or 42,100 (SA) and those numbers are likely to be revised upwards. For the numbers to reconcile, this disparity suggests that at least 37,000 contract workers, sole proprietors, or family businesses went out of business over the past year.

The U.S. LAUS Data shows that between the 2008 peak and the 2010 trough, the U.S. lost more than seven million jobs. It has since recovered 67% of these jobs.

From October 2011 to October 2012, the LAUS data reports that the number of employed in the U.S. has increased by 3.1 million. Over the past year, U.S. CES employment has increased by more than 1.922 million (NSA) or 1.949 million (SA). The differences between these numbers can be reconciled, as the difference can most likely be attributed to the growth of contract workers, family businesses, or sole proprietors.

The LAUS data shows that Colorado has recovered 26% of the jobs lost during the Great Recession compared to 67% for the U.S.

These results raise yet another red flag about the LAUS data published by the Colorado LMI, CDLE, and BLS. Click on the following dates for a review of the downturns for the 1980s and the late 2000s.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Are We Better Off Now Than We Were Four Years Ago? – The United States

horvath

During this election season the politicians have raised the question, “Are we better off now than we were four years ago?” It is easy to find data that supports or rejects the notion that “we” are better off today, but it is difficult to provide a clear cut answer either way.

U.S. Output
• Real GDP output is stronger than 4 years ago, although it is increasing at a less than desirable rate.
• Since 1930 Real GDP has increased 64 of 82 years, or 78% of the time. It has declined in back-to-back years from 1930 to 1933, 1945 to 1947, 1974 to 1975, and 2008 to 2009. It is very simple. Because the U.S. population is growing there is increased demand for goods most of the time, hence increased output.

U.S. Debt
• From 1966 to 2000, the Federal debt rose from $.3 trillion to $5.8 trillion. By mid-2012 it has reached almost $16 trillion.
• From Q3 2008 to Q4 2010 consumers began deleveraging. Since then, they have continued to take on debt at a pre-2008 pace.
• While an argument can be made that it was necessary for the U.S. to incur a portion of the debt to prevent a depression, it is difficult to justify the over-consumption by consumers.

U.S. Employment and Unemployment
• During the 69 months between January 2007 and September 2012 the U.S. lost jobs in 31 months and gained jobs in 38 months.
• In 2012, total U.S. employment is below total employment in 2008; jobs are being added at a faster rate than they were in 2008.
• In 2012 the number of jobs added is trending upward, whereas it was trending downward in 2008.
• The number of unemployed workers is much higher in 2012 than in 2007 and 2008.
• The unemployment rate in 2012 is much higher than in 2008.
• In 2012, the unemployment rate and the number of unemployed workers is trending downward, whereas, it was trending upward in 2008.
• Since 1940 U.S. employment has increased 54 of 72 years, or 80% of the time. Five of the 14 declining years have occurred in the past decade (2002-2003 and 2008-2010). The increase in population coupled with the increase in demand for goods and services has generally resulted in an increase in jobs.

Financial Well-Being
• The 2012 Credability Consumer Distress Index is above the 2008 level and trending upwards (this is good news).  Consumers are still “At Risk.”
• Health Care Coverage – The 2011 percentage of coverage is slightly below the 2008 level.
• Dow Jones Industrial Average – the DJIA is about 4,800 points above its level at this time (October) in 2008.
• Housing prices – Nationally, 2012 housing prices are below 2008 levels.

Transportation
• Average gas prices for 2008 were $3.21 per gallon. Through the first 44 weeks of 2012, average prices are $3.57 per gallon.
• After bottoming out in early 2009 U.S. auto sales have trended upward and are approaching 15 million a year.  Sales in 2012 are better than 2008.

For more detailed analysis of the state of the economy compared to four years ago, visit https://cber.co or click here.

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Most Recent Labor Report Not What Incumbents Want to Hear

horvath

The October 5th Bureau of Labor Statistics press release was disappointing, particularly for incumbents in the upcoming elections. The report indicated that the U.S. added only 114,000 nonfarm jobs in September. It stated, “Employment increased in health care and in transportation and warehousing but changed little in most other major industries.” While job creation is important, the expansion of these industries does little to create jobs in other sectors.

The recent update also indicated that there are 12 million Americans out of work. Four years ago that number was 9.5 million and 6 years ago it was 6.8 million. The fact that the unemployment rate edged downward to 7.8% seems somewhat irrelevant given this data.

The data can be looked at from a slightly different perspective. That view indicates that the nation has regained about half the jobs lost as a result of the Great Recession. Ugh!

The private sector added 104,000 jobs for the month, while government employment added 10,000 workers. This is the second month in a row for increased government employment. While some have an unfavorable view of job gains in the public sector, in this case, it may be a positive indicator that state and local revenue streams have improved.

The BLS announcement was preceded by the ADP employment report which stated that private nonfarm employment had risen by 162,000 in September, 189,000 in August, and 156,000 in July. At this point, ADP is clearly more optimistic about the recovery than the BLS.

On average, Colorado nonfarm employment comprises about 1.72% of the U.S. total. If Colorado grows at the same pace as the U.S., the state data will gain about 2,000 jobs in September. We’ll see what BLS says in their monthly update on October 19th.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Historical Colorado Output Growth Greater Than U.S.

horvath

The Bureau of Economic Analysis recently released 2011 State Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data by NAICS sector. Last year the top industries for the U.S. and Colorado were similar, but they were ranked in different order.

United States Gross Domestic Product 2011 (Sum of States)
• $14.981 trillion.
• Private sector is 87.4% of total GDP; Government is 12.6%.
• Manufacturing; Real Estate/Rental/Leasing; Finance/Insurance are 32.4% of total GDP.
• Professional/ Scientific/Technical; Health Care/Social Assistance, and Retail Trade are 21.6% of the total.
Colorado Gross Domestic Product 2011
• $264.308 billion.
• Private sector is 87.2% of total GDP; Government is 12.8%.
• Real Estate/Rental/Leasing; Professional/Scientific/Technical; and Information are 30.1% of total GDP.
• Manufacturing; Finance/Insurance; and Health Care/Social Assistance are 20.7% of the total.

A quick and dirty historical analysis shows that
• Colorado’s Real GDP (2.9%) grew at a faster rate than the U.S. Real GDP (2.1%) from 1997 to 2011 as well as from 2007 to 2011 (0.7% vs. 0.0%).
• Both the private and public sector real output for Colorado grew at a faster rate than the U.S from 1997 to 2011, as well as from 2007 to 2011. Colorado is listed first in the following comparisons.
o Private sector for 1997 to 2011  3.1% vs.2.2%.
o Private sector for 2007 to 2011  0.5% vs. -0.1%.
o Public sector for 2007 to 2011  1.1% vs. 0.8%
o Public sector for 2007 to 2011  2.2% vs. 0.6%.

For the period 1997 to 2011, four sectors had negative annualized growth in the U.S.: Construction, Utilities, Mining, Construction, and Administrative/Waste Management. Construction is the only sector that posted a decline in Colorado. Colorado outperformed the nation in all sectors except Transportation/Warehousing, Real Estate/Rental/Leasing, Administrative/Waste Management, and Arts/Entertainment/Recreation.

It is important to note that some of the sectors with strongest output growth were sectors that incurred declines in jobs over this period. The Manufacturing and Information sectors are two key examples).

For a detailed analysis of the state GDP, click here (Special Reports section) or go to cber.co.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.