Tag: Unemployment rate

Colorado Jobs Data for October – Mixed Message

horvath Leave a comment

The recent BLS jobs report for Colorado had mixed news.

The good news is that Colorado will see solid job growth this year. The bad news is that jobs are being added at a slower rate than earlier in the year.

On the street, most Colorado business owners are not pleased with government leadership, but they are generally upbeat about the economy.

The unemployment rate was flat from February through August. The slight declines in September and October are a sign that the rate continues to slowly move downward. BLS reports the state rate is lower than the rate for the U.S.; however, it is not statistically different than the U.S. (The latest state rate is 6.8% compared to 7.3% for the U.S.)

On a positive note, the number of unemployed workers has fallen to 185,500. This is the lowest number of unemployed since February 2009; however, it is more than twice the pre-recession number.

The wage and salary data is mostly positive. The average number of jobs added for the first 10 months of 2013 is about 56,400 greater than the same period last year. Unfortunately, jobs have been added at a declining rate since March.

Colorado is on track to add about 55,000 jobs for 2013, an increase of 2.3%. The question is, “Given this downward trend in the number of jobs being added, what lies ahead for 2014?”

All jobs are important; however, there is concern there are too few jobs being added that “create” other jobs or bring in wealth from the outside. The lack of a sufficient number of new primary jobs may be the reason for the decreasing rate of growth. State and local economic developers are working hard to address this issue.

It is unlikely the state numbers were noticeably impacted by the September flooding and the limited Government shutdown. The flooding clearly had a negative impact on the local economies and the limited government shutdown may have caused inconvenience for cities and companies that are heavily dependent on federal funding. These events will likely have a greater impact on overall output than employment.

For the most part, the latest jobs report bodes well for the state.


©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Surprise – U.S. Employment up by 200,000/month from August to September

horvath Leave a comment

On November 8th the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the U.S. employment was up by 204,000 in the month of October. This was a shock to many, particularly given the weak ADP numbers published in late October.

The BLS delivered a second surprise by bumping up the net jobs added for August and September. Unfortunately, the number of unemployed in October was only 44,000 less than August, and the unemployment rate, 7.3%, was the same for both months.

For the first 10 months of 2013, U.S. employment increased at an average rate of 186,300 jobs per month. This is above the monthly average for 2012 (185,000) and 2011 (175,000).

U.S. job growth was strong in the first quarter of 2013, but the increases became more tepid as the year progressed. Average job growth for the past three months is slightly above 200,000. The December release will show the extent to which Congress’ game of chicken with the Federal budget derailed this momentum.

U.S. Employment Situation

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Colorado Legislative Council and OSPB Optimistic About 2014

horvath Leave a comment

On September 20th, both the Colorado Legislative Council (CLC) and the Governor’s Office of State Planning and Budgeting (OSPB) released their quarterly economic updates. Their preliminary look at 2014 is positive.

Highlights from the CLC outlook for 2014 are:
• The unemployment rate will drop to 6.9%.
• 55,400 wage and salary jobs will be added.
• Retail trade sales will increase by 5.4%.
• 35,400 home building permits will be issued.
• Inflation will increase by 3.2%.
In summary, CLC feels the state will continue to add jobs at a similar rate to 2013, but unemployment will not decline substantially. Retail trade sales will show strong growth and there will be a modest increase in home building permits. Inflation may become an issue.

Highlights from the OSPB outlook for 2014 are:
• The unemployment rate will decline to 6.5%.
• 57,500 wage and salary jobs will be added.
• Retail trade sales will increase by 5.4%.
• 37,300 home building permits will be issued.
• Inflation will increase by 2.4%.
Job growth will be similar to 2013, which will lead to a slight decline in unemployment. Retail trade sales will show strong growth and the housing market will post modest gains. Inflation will remain in check.

For more details, check out the CLC quarterly report  and the OSPB report by clicking here. Both groups produce comprehensive economic updates on a quarterly basis. They are “must read” material for anyone interested in the state economy. The reports are released around the 20th of the month in March, June, September, and December.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Despite Solid Job Growth the Number of Unemployed has Dropped Very Little in 2013

horvath Leave a comment

This year Colorado is expected to add over 55,000 wage and salary workers, an increase of about 2.5%. This equates to about 4,600 jobs each month.

But there is a downside.

Between January and March of this year the unemployment rate dropped slightly from 7.3% to 7.1%. Since then the rate has moved within the range of 6.9% and 7.1% (see blue line in chart below). These changes are not statistically significant.

The unemployment rate has been stagnant because there has not been a significant change in the size of the labor force or the number of unemployed.

In August, there were 194,068 unemployed workers in Colorado (see red line in chart below). As a point of reference, the lowest number of unemployed prior to the recession was 93,736 in April 2007 and the peak was 245,928 in October 2010.

The number of unemployed workers declined by 6,628 between January and August; however, there was a drop of only 1,561 between March and August. In August 2013 the number of unemployed was 194,068.

Some high tech industries are struggling to find qualified workers, particularly in specialized positions. On the other hand, the unemployment rate in other industries remains in double digits. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that a portion of the sidelined workers do not have the skills or education to fill positions in industries with low unemployment rates.

Clearly, the recovery from the Great Recession created a dysfunctional economy.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Proved Oil Reserve Leaders have Lowered Their Unemployment Rate Faster than U.S., Except for Colorado and California

horvath Leave a comment

In 2007 nine of the top ten states for proved oil reserves had an unemployment rate lower than the U.S. rate.

In 2012, nine of these top ten states had an unemployment rate lower than the U.S. rate, although the Colorado rate was lower by only 0.1 percentage points.

For the U.S., the gap between the 2012 and 2007 unemployment rate was 3.5 percentage points (8.1% – 4.6%).  The percentage point gap for the top 10 states with proven oil reserves is:

  • 5.1 California
  • 4.2 Colorado
  • 3.4 New Mexico
  • 3.1 Utah
  • 2.6 Wyoming
  • 2.4 Texas
  • 1.7 Louisiana
  • 1.1 Oklahoma
  • 0.9 Alaska
  • 0.0 North Dakota

In other words, the economies in 8 of the 10 leading oil reserve states experienced faster reduction in unemployment rates, presumably in part because of the growth in the extractive industries. California and Colorado are the exceptions. For the state of Colorado, it is reasonable to ask the question, “Is Colorado’s high gap a result of more stringent regulation and growing opposition to fracking?”

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

CDLE’s Monthly Unemployment Data Misses the Mark in 2012

horvath Leave a comment

Last year, did it  seem like the Colorado unemployment rate didn’t match what was happening on the streets?

For the most part, the initial data, which is used in the monthly CDLE media blitz, told a much different story from the unheralded benchmark revisions released in March. In fact, the correlation coefficient between the initial release data and the March benchmark data is .44. This means there is a relationship between the two data sets, but it is not strong.

The initial data indicated that unemployment rate was flat at 7.8% for the first quarter, had four months of increases up to 8.3%, then five months of declines.

On the other hand, the benchmarked revisions started at 8.3% and dropped in February to 8.2%. The rate stayed at that level until June, when it declined for the last 6 months of the year.  The benchmarked data ended the year at 7.5% compared to 7.6% for the initial data.

Good data is most valuable during times when the economy is the most volatile. The unemployment rate published by the Colorado Department of Labor failed to meet that critical need in 2012.


©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

U.S. Unemployment is on the Decline, but not for all Occupations

horvath Leave a comment

There is good news on the unemployment front – the rate and number of unemployed workers continues to decline.

There are 2.0 million unemployed workers in occupations with unemployment rates below the natural rate (4.5% to 5.0%). Many of these occupations require a college degree.  The two-digit Standard Occupational Code (SOC) precedes each category
33 Protective service                       4.1%
19 Life sciences                               4.0%
11 Management                               4.0%
25 Education                                     3.8%
17 Architecture & engineering       3.8%
13 Business & finance                   3.7%
15 Computer & math                       3.5%
21 Community & social services  3.5%
23 Legal                                             3.1%
29 Healthcare practitioners            2.5%

There are 2.4 million unemployed workers in occupations with unemployment rates between the natural rate and the U.S. average (7.8%).  Some of these occupations require some form of higher education.
27 Arts & design                                7.8%
43 Office support                               7.6%
31 Healthcare support                      7.3%
49 Installation & maintenance        6.0%

There are 6.9 million unemployed workers in occupations with unemployment rates above the U.S. average.  Most of these occupations don’t require higher education.
45 Farming, fishing, & forestry       16.1%
47 Construction & extraction          15.8%
37 Building maintenance                13.3%
35 Food preparation                         11.0%
53 Transportation                             10.9%
39 Personal care & service               9.2%
51 Production                                       9.1%
41 Sales & related                              8.2%

In many cases, there is a clear mismatch of worker skills and company needs. In part, this has exacerbated the length of the recovery.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Data Not Clear About Whether Colorado is Outperforming the Nation in the Recovery

horvath Leave a comment

The wage and salary data produced by BLS shows that Colorado has recovered about 67% of jobs lost as a result of the Great Recession compared to 51% for the U.S.

The LAUS data also produced by BLS tells a much different story.

The Colorado LAUS Data shows that between the 2008 peak and the 2010 trough, Colorado lost more than 135,000 jobs. As of October 2012, the state had recovered only 26% of these jobs.

From October 2011 to October 2012, the LAUS data reports that the number of employed in Colorado has increased by 4,700. Over the past year, state CES employment has increased by 41,600 (NSA) or 42,100 (SA) and those numbers are likely to be revised upwards. For the numbers to reconcile, this disparity suggests that at least 37,000 contract workers, sole proprietors, or family businesses went out of business over the past year.

The U.S. LAUS Data shows that between the 2008 peak and the 2010 trough, the U.S. lost more than seven million jobs. It has since recovered 67% of these jobs.

From October 2011 to October 2012, the LAUS data reports that the number of employed in the U.S. has increased by 3.1 million. Over the past year, U.S. CES employment has increased by more than 1.922 million (NSA) or 1.949 million (SA). The differences between these numbers can be reconciled, as the difference can most likely be attributed to the growth of contract workers, family businesses, or sole proprietors.

The LAUS data shows that Colorado has recovered 26% of the jobs lost during the Great Recession compared to 67% for the U.S.

These results raise yet another red flag about the LAUS data published by the Colorado LMI, CDLE, and BLS. Click on the following dates for a review of the downturns for the 1980s and the late 2000s.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Stagnancy in the Size of the Colorado Labor Force – The Lost Decade and Beyond

horvath Leave a comment

In a previous post, the topic of discussion was the stagnancy of the labor force during the 1980s (click here). In that case the size of the labor force was flat for about five years because of a regional recession, weak wage and salary job growth, and negative net migration. This post will look at the size of the labor force during the Great Recession and beyond.

Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) are available for Colorado beginning in 1976. Since then, the month-over-prior month labor force increased about 87% of the time (383 of 442 months). In a vibrant economy, periodic ups and downs are expected, but increases in the size of the labor force are generally the rule of the thumb.

Between April 2000 and October 2012 there were 30 months with decreases in the month-over-prior month size of the labor force. In January 2008 there were 2,722,015 workers. By April 2009 the number had risen to 2,758,468 workers.

During the past 42 months, there were 19 month-over-prior month declines. There were 2,725,803 workers in the October 2012 labor force. This was 32,665 fewer than the level in April 2009 and essentially the same as January 2008.

Next, we will look at three data sets for the period: Wage and Salary job growth, Net migration, and the Unemployment Rate.

For the years, 2009-2012, wage and salary job growth was devastating, with back-to-back net job losses in 2009 and 2010. The net change in wage and salary jobs follows:
• 2008 19,000
• 2009 -104,700
• 2010 -23,300
• 2011  33,000
• 2012 est  45,000

Unlike the 1980s, when the state experienced negative net migration, there has been solid positive net migration, i.e. more people moved into the state than out of it. The net migration follows:
• 2008 45,000
• 2009 36,300
• 2010 37,000
• 2011 34,900
• 2012 est 36,800

For this period the unemployment rate varied from 4.8% to 8.0%. While the monthly rate has dropped from a high of 9.0% in 2010, the 2012 annual rate remains the same as it was in 2009.
• 2008 4.8%
• 2009 8.1%
• 2010 8.9%
• 2011 8.3%
• 2012 8.0%

For all intensive purposes, the size of the labor force will be about the same as it was at the end of 2009 and the number of employed and unemployed workers will be similar.

• The 33,000 wage and salary jobs added in 2011 lowered the unemployment rate by 0.6% points, yet growth of 45,000 jobs in 2012 will lower it by 0.3% points.
• For the period 2008 to 2012, total net migration was 190,000; approximately 125,000 of these individuals are 16-65 years old.

This raises a series of questions:
• How many people have become contract or 1099 workers? How many have become sole proprietors and owned family businesses? How many people are working temporary jobs? Will they still work in this capacity when the economy recovers or will they take wage and salary jobs?
• How many workers have stopped working who don’t show up in the data?
• What are the in migrants doing? Did they take jobs that Colorado residents might have taken? Are they working in other capacities?
• How many families with dual incomes now only have one income?
• Have the published unemployment numbers been manipulated to meet political agendas?

There seem to be more questions than answers and the numbers do not seem to reconcile. As grave as the employment situation has been, it appears that the unemployment rate may be inaccurate and may have understated the magnitude of the problem.


©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Stagnancy in the Size of the Colorado Labor Force – 1980s

horvath Leave a comment

The unemployment rate is one of the most popular, but overrated statistics for measuring the performance of the economy. It is such a crude measurement of economic performance that the state’s labor economist was recently quoted in the media as saying that it shouldn’t be taken at face value.

The calculation of the unemployment rate is simple. The number of unemployed workers is added to the number of employed workers (wage and salary, sole proprietors, and others) and that equals the size of the labor force. The unemployment rate is simply the number of unemployed workers divided by the size of the labor force.

In other words, the size of the labor force is a key component in determining the accuracy of the unemployment rate. This brings us to the topic of this post – the size of the labor force.

Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) are available for Colorado beginning in 1976. Since then, month-over-prior month labor force increased about 87% of the time (383 of 442 months). In a vibrant economy, periodic ups and downs are expected, but increases in the size of the labor force are generally the rule of the thumb.

There are two periods when the size of the labor force did not increase, during the 1980s and the late 2000s. The following analysis looks a period during the 1980s.

Between September 1984 through April 1989 the size of the labor force declined in 29 of 53 months.

In August 1984 the size of the labor force, as measured by LAUS data,  was 1,719,239. It declined sharply in 1985, bounced back for most of 1986, and fell sharply in 1987. It remained flat for much of 1988 and into the first part of 1989. In June of 1989, the labor force was reported at 1,719,824. From that point, it continued to grow.

Next, we will look at three data sets for the period: Wage and Salary job growth, Net migration, and the unemployment rate.

During this period, Wage and Salary (CES)  job growth was weak, with net job losses in 1987. The net change in wage and salary jobs follows:
• 1984   75,100
• 1985   16,400
• 1986  -10,400
• 1987       4,300
• 1988    23,500
• 1989    46,200
• 1990    38,600

The CES and LAUS series are different measures of employment, but they should tell a similar story about changes in employment.

During this period the state experienced negative net migration, i.e. more people moved out of the state than into the state. The net migration follows:
• 1984      2,782
• 1985      5,172
• 1986     -5,270
• 1987   -13,997
• 1988   -24,280
• 1989   -18,752
• 1990   -12,964

For this period the unemployment rate varied from 5.4% to 7.5%. It remained at a higher than normal level because unemployed workers were able to move outside the region and find work. The annual unemployment rates for this period were:
• 1984   5.4%
• 1985   6.0%
• 1986   7.5%
• 1987   7.5%
• 1988   6.4%
• 1989   5.6%
• 1990   5.1%

The labor force was stagnant for about five years for the following reasons:
• There was a regional recession
• Weak wage and salary job growth
• Negative net migration.

A similar stagnancy in the size of the labor force occurred during the 2000s. It is more difficult to understand and will be discussed in a later post (click here).


©Copyright 2011 by CBER.