Colorado Outperforms U.S. in Real GDP Growth

Today the Bureau of Economic Analysis released its updated real GDP data by state for 2013. There were increases in 49 of the 50 states, with Alaska being the one state showing a decline.

In 2013 U.S. Real GDP growth expanded at a rate of 1.8%, compared to 2.5% in 2012. Private sector growth grew by 2.3% in 2013 compared to 3.0% in 2012.

In short, Colorado outperformed the U.S. in output growth last year. While the rate for the U.S. declined, real GDP growth for Colorado increased.

Nationally, the top six contributors to absolute growth were:

• Real estate and rental and leasing
• Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting
• Health care and social assistance
• Finance and insurance
• Wholesale trade
• Professional, scientific, and technical services.

Combined, these 6 categories accounted for 53.6% of the change in U.S. output in 2013.

The Colorado Real GDP growth increased from 3.0% in 2012 to 3.8% in 2013. Real private sector growth expanded at a rate of 4.2% in 2013 compared to 3.4% in 2012.

In Colorado the leading contributors to absolute growth were:
• Mining
• Real estate and rental and leasing
• Professional, scientific, and technical services
• Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting
• Construction
• Government.

Combined these six sectors accounted for 75% of the change in Colorado output in 2013.

There is a significant difference between the composition of the top contributors for the U.S. and Colorado. In part this helps explain why the Colorado economy has outperformed the U.S. economy over the past five years.

Note: There is a slight difference between the national GDP and the national GDP calculated as a summary by state outputs. Details are explained on the BEA website. Also, for methodological reasons, the contributions to absolute growth were calculated using the nominal GDP data.

Output Projections for Global Economy Show Improvement

The global economy is poised for a turn-around in 2014, with stronger growth in most regions. At this time a year ago most output projections for 2013 pointed to lower growth rates than 2012. Today, both the Conference Board -TCB- and the International Monetary Fund -IMF- are optimistic about the global economy in 2014 – truly a pleasant change.

Part of the good news is that the optimistic projections are broad-based and the most notable improvements are in the U.S. and Europe economies.

TCB ouput projections for 2013 vs. 2014 are:

  • Global                  2.8% vs. 3.1%
  • Mature                 1.0% vs. 1.7%
  • Emerging             4.7% vs. 4.6%

IMF output projections for 2013 vs. 2014 are:

  • Global                  2.9% vs. 3.6%
  • Mature                 1.2% vs. 2.0%
  • Emerging             4.5% vs. 5.1%

The IMF is slightly more optimistic than TCB, particularly with its output projections for the emerging countries. Let’s hope they are correct.
output projections

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Agriculture Output Trended Downward 2009 to 2012 – Will There Be a Turn Around in 2013

Real Agriculture output peaked in 2009 for both Colorado and the U.S. and it has trended downward for the period 2009 to 2012.

Between 1997 and 2012, the Bureau of Economic Analysis statistics show:

  • The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.3% and the U.S. Agriculture sector increased annually at a rate of 1.7%.
  • The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 3.1%. The Colorado Agriculture sector increased annually at a rate of 1.5%.

Although Colorado private sector output expanded at a significantly faster rate than the U.S.between 1997 and 2012, Agriculture output for the state grew at a slightly slower rate.

Between 2009 and 2012, the data shows:

  • The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.5% and the U.S. Agriculture sector decreased at an annualized rate of -6.9%.
  • The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 2.2%. The Colorado Agriculture sector declined annually at a rate of 11.7%.

Farmers and ranchers have their fingers crossed that the downward trend will be reversed in 2013.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Construction Output Declined for Eleven Years – Reversed in 2012

Real GDP for the Construction sector finally rebounded in 2012, after decreasing for eleven years, 2001 to 2011.

Between 1997 and 2012, the Bureau of Economic Analysis statistics show:

  • The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.3% and the U.S. Construction sector declined annually at a rate of -1.5%.
  • The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 3.1%. The Colorado Construction sector declined annually at a rate of -2.4%.

For this period, the Colorado Construction sector was hit much harder than the U.S. In addition, the recovery was much slower for Colorado.

Between 2009 and 2012, the data shows:

  • The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.5% and the U.S. Construction sector increased at an annualized rate of 0.5%.
  • The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 2.2%. The Colorado Construction sector declined annually at a rate of -1.4%.

Preliminary data suggests that 2013 Colorado Construction output will again be positive and that it will be stronger than the nation.


©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Policy and Prices Impact Output for Extractive Industries – Is Colorado Closed for Business?

The extractive industries are an important and visible part of Colorado’s economy. In 2012, Colorado’s GDP was 1.76% of the U.S. GDP and Colorado’s Mining sector output was 3.58% of the U.S. Mining sector output.  In other words, Colorado’s extractive industries critical components of both the state and the national economy.

Between 1997 and 2012, there were stark differences in the state and national output for the extractive industries and the private sector.

  • The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.3% and the extractive industries were -0.6%.
  • The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 3.1% and the extractive industries grew at a rate of 3.6%.

Nationally sector output trended downward from 1997 to 2005 and trended upward from 2005 to 2009. Between 2009 and 2012, sector output trended downward again.

In Colorado sector output  trended upward from 1997 to 2009; however, it has trended downward since 2009.

  • The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.5% and extractive industry output was -2.0%.
  • The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 2.2% and extractive industry output was -4.0%.

The variance in output has been caused by changes in prices, supply and demand, and policy. Recently, the latter has had the most detrimental impact on the industry in Colorado.  Policy and anti-fracking efforts are likely to further suppress output in the months ahead. In addition to reducing output, this will create the perception that Colorado is not a business-friendly state.


©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

State Per Capita Real GDP Increased by 1.1% Since 1997

There are many data sets that can be used to evaluate the performance of the state and national economy. One of those metrics is Per Capita Real GDP. This measure is derived by dividing real output by the population.

For the period 1997 to 2012, Per Capita Real GDP for Colorado and the U.S. grew at essentially the same rate, 1.11% and 1.13% respectively.

Within that period there were some differences:

  •  Between 1997 and 2001 the Per Capita Real GDP for Colorado increased at an annualized rate of  3.88% compared to 2.49% for the U.S.
  •  Between 2001 and 2012 the Per Capita Real GDP for Colorado increased at an annualized rate of  0.13% compared to 0.64% for the U.S.
  • Between 2009 and 2012 the Per Capita Real GDP for Colorado grew at an annualized rate of 0.58% compared to 1.39% for the U.S.

During the final years of the go-go 90s, Per Capita Real GDP for the state increased at a faster rate than the nation.  Since the 2001 recession, the nation has outpaced the state.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Historical Colorado Output Growth Greater Than U.S.

The Bureau of Economic Analysis recently released 2011 State Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data by NAICS sector. Last year the top industries for the U.S. and Colorado were similar, but they were ranked in different order.

United States Gross Domestic Product 2011 (Sum of States)
• $14.981 trillion.
• Private sector is 87.4% of total GDP; Government is 12.6%.
• Manufacturing; Real Estate/Rental/Leasing; Finance/Insurance are 32.4% of total GDP.
• Professional/ Scientific/Technical; Health Care/Social Assistance, and Retail Trade are 21.6% of the total.
Colorado Gross Domestic Product 2011
• $264.308 billion.
• Private sector is 87.2% of total GDP; Government is 12.8%.
• Real Estate/Rental/Leasing; Professional/Scientific/Technical; and Information are 30.1% of total GDP.
• Manufacturing; Finance/Insurance; and Health Care/Social Assistance are 20.7% of the total.

A quick and dirty historical analysis shows that
• Colorado’s Real GDP (2.9%) grew at a faster rate than the U.S. Real GDP (2.1%) from 1997 to 2011 as well as from 2007 to 2011 (0.7% vs. 0.0%).
• Both the private and public sector real output for Colorado grew at a faster rate than the U.S from 1997 to 2011, as well as from 2007 to 2011. Colorado is listed first in the following comparisons.
o Private sector for 1997 to 2011  3.1% vs.2.2%.
o Private sector for 2007 to 2011  0.5% vs. -0.1%.
o Public sector for 2007 to 2011  1.1% vs. 0.8%
o Public sector for 2007 to 2011  2.2% vs. 0.6%.

For the period 1997 to 2011, four sectors had negative annualized growth in the U.S.: Construction, Utilities, Mining, Construction, and Administrative/Waste Management. Construction is the only sector that posted a decline in Colorado. Colorado outperformed the nation in all sectors except Transportation/Warehousing, Real Estate/Rental/Leasing, Administrative/Waste Management, and Arts/Entertainment/Recreation.

It is important to note that some of the sectors with strongest output growth were sectors that incurred declines in jobs over this period. The Manufacturing and Information sectors are two key examples).

For a detailed analysis of the state GDP, click here (Special Reports section) or go to cber.co.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.