Extractive Industries Archives - Colorado-based Business and Economic Research

Where is the Colorado Oil and Gas Industry Headed?

May 1, 2015May 22, 2015 horvath Leave a comment

There has been concern by some that the freefall in the price of a barrel of oil last year would cause a sharp downturn in the Colorado economy.

In fact, the University of Colorado Leeds School of Business has projected that the loss of oil and gas jobs will cause total employment to grow at a rate less than 2.0% this year. That means that average employment for the year would be less than 50,000. It would also mean that average job growth for the last three quarters of the year would be at most 41,000 jobs.

The 2015 cber.co forecast projected a slight decline in the rate of growth (+73,000 to 79,000 jobs), in part because of uncertainty in the oil and gas industry. It seems unlikely the decline will be as severe as projected by the Leeds School.

A frequently quoted data set is rig count. The data shows a sharp drop-off in the number of rigs. The immediate reaction is that “the sky is falling.”

Industry experts state this decline in the number of rigs has occurred, in part, because companies have taken their older and poorer performing rigs off-line to increase their efficiency. This is no different than the Denver Broncos cutting Champ Bailey. A decrease in the number of rigs will eventually point to a decline in the number of employees.

In addition, some companies are adopting improved technology, which has the potential to make the drilling process much more efficient and environmentally friendly. Increased efficiency means that when some of these jobs go away they won’t ever come back. In that sense, the oil and gas industry is moving down the same path as manufacturing and other industries.

Another interesting data set is oil production.

Colorado oil production reached records levels in 2014 and is expected to remain strong through Q1 2015. Levels of production may drop off in Q2 as storage becomes an issue.

Another issue affecting production levels is demand. Global demand for oil has been declining as alternate sources of energy have become more available. In addition, more efficient automobiles and other devices have reduced consumption. Despite the decline in demand, the U.S. has become less dependent on foreign countries for our oil supplies. In turn that will drive demand for U.S. oil.

Looking ahead – employment in the Colorado oil and gas industry will either grow at a slower rate or decline slightly in 2015. The state economy is on solid enough footing that many of those lost jobs will be offset by increases in other industries such as construction, finance, and manufacturing.

In short, the Colorado Oil and Gas Industry is in a state of flux, but it is unlikely that volatility will cause a noticeable downturn in state employment.

Healthcare, Extractive Industries, and Wages

November 26, 2014January 2, 2015 horvath Leave a comment

Looking ahead to 2015 there are three issues that will impact the economy in 2015: healthcare, extractive industries, and wages.

Healthcare
The healthcare industry may play an important role in the economy in 2015.
• First, there are shortages of workers in many key positions. This may affect the care consumers receive from their service providers and it may increase the costs of doing business.
• Second, providers are being pushed by Obamacare and insurance companies to reduce the fees they charge. In turn, this may reduce their margins.
• Third, it was recently announced that Colorado employers will face an 8% increase in the cost of insurance. Likely, a portion of that increase will be passed on to workers. That could reduce that amount of discretionary income, which in turn could reduce retail consumption.
• In addition, it has been announced that Connect for Health Colorado, will reduce subsidies. In other words, many Coloradans will have to pay significantly more for coverage, go without healthcare, or pay a fine to the government. Coloradans will face sticker shock when they get their health insurance bills in 2015.

Extractive Industries and Prices of Oil and Gasoline
The extractive industries will continue to face challenges in 2015. Fracking is still an issue in Colorado that will not go away. Local governments are pushing to have greater control over the way the extractive industries operate in their jurisdiction.

In addition, the price of oil has trended downward for the past six months. If these trends continue, it may impact production in Colorado, which will hit the smaller companies first. It will also impact severance taxes paid to the state government.

At the same time consumers have enjoyed lower prices at the pump. Their gasoline bills for 2013 and 2014 will be similar. If lower prices continue into 2015, consumers may notice a reduction in their annual gasoline bill in the range of $400 to $800 for the year.

If prices at the pump continue to decline Colorado consumers will be the benefactors, but state coffers suffer. Typically the negative impact for the state outweighs the positive impact on the consumer.

Wages
Typically, when unemployment dips below the natural rate of employment, 4.5% to 5.0%, there is usually upward pressure on wages. Overall that has not been the case in Colorado.

Between 2007 and 2014
• The Denver Boulder Greeley CPI (DBG) increased at an annualized rate of 2.4%
• The Private Sector Average Weekly Wages (AWW) increased by an annualized rate of 1.7%.
Inflation for this period grew at a faster rate than private wages for this period.

Between 2013 and 2014
• The DBG CPI is projected to increase by 2.8%/
• The Private Sector AWW will increase by 2.0%.

The Construction and Financial Activities are isolated sectors that have seen strong wage growth in the last couple of years because the demand for qualified employees has exceeded the supply of workers.

Construction Wages
• Between 2008 and 2012 AWW declined. In 2013 it increased by 11.0% followed by an increase of 11% in 2014. Construction businesses have found that it has been necessary to raise wages this amount to attract workers. Ultimately these labor costs will be passed on to consumers.
Financial Activities
• The financial activities sector has also had strong wage growth, 5.0% annualized growth, from 2007 to 2014. Between 2007 and 2010 Average Weekly Wages decreased, but they have increased significantly since. AWW will increase by 7.3% in 2014

On the other hand, 2014 inflation growth will exceed the change in wages for Manufacturing, Tourism, and Professional and Business Services. These three industries are critical to the state economy for different reasons.

Watch for healthcare, extractive industries, and wages to impact the Colorado Economy in 2015 – and the impact may not always be positive.

Policy and Prices Impact Output for Extractive Industries – Is Colorado Closed for Business?

July 3, 2013July 3, 2013 horvath Leave a comment

The extractive industries are an important and visible part of Colorado’s economy. In 2012, Colorado’s GDP was 1.76% of the U.S. GDP and Colorado’s Mining sector output was 3.58% of the U.S. Mining sector output. In other words, Colorado’s extractive industries critical components of both the state and the national economy.

Between 1997 and 2012, there were stark differences in the state and national output for the extractive industries and the private sector.

The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.3% and the extractive industries were -0.6%.
The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 3.1% and the extractive industries grew at a rate of 3.6%.

Nationally sector output trended downward from 1997 to 2005 and trended upward from 2005 to 2009. Between 2009 and 2012, sector output trended downward again.

In Colorado sector output trended upward from 1997 to 2009; however, it has trended downward since 2009.

The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.5% and extractive industry output was -2.0%.
The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 2.2% and extractive industry output was -4.0%.

The variance in output has been caused by changes in prices, supply and demand, and policy. Recently, the latter has had the most detrimental impact on the industry in Colorado. Policy and anti-fracking efforts are likely to further suppress output in the months ahead. In addition to reducing output, this will create the perception that Colorado is not a business-friendly state.

Goods Producing Sectors Poised to Add Jobs this Year

August 1, 2012August 1, 2012 horvath Leave a comment

Companies are divided into two categories: Goods Producing sectors and Service Producing sectors. In simplistic terms: you make stuff or you do stuff.

One of the reasons the Goods Producing category is important is that many primary jobs are in these sectors. The NAICS categories include the Extractive Industries, Construction, and Manufacturing.

Only twice (1997 and 1998) since 1990 have all three sectors added jobs in the same year. At the midpoint of 2012, the trio are in a position to show gains for this year also. Previously the gains were a result of an economy hitting on all cylinders. This time the gains will occur because of an economy that has misfired and the sectors have nowhere else to go but up. They are playing a small, but extremely important role in the recovery.

For additional details on the Colorado economy click here or go to https://cber.co/.

The Employment Recession Has Finally Ended

April 12, 2011May 31, 2014 horvath Leave a comment

When the NBER officially announced the end of the Great Recession, the general reaction was, “Oh really?” It was clear to most that while the technical recession was over, the employment recession was not.

More recently, it has been announced that the employment recession has ended, although unemployment remains high. In the case of Colorado, the rate has reached record levels and is higher than the U.S. Again, the general reaction has been, “Oh really?”

Yes, the country is in expansion mode again. (The unemployment rate is dismal, but it is a lagging indicator.)

There are clearly risks to the continued expansion; however, sufficient momentum appears to be in place to sustain growth in the near-term. Arguments supporting the expansion follow…

Mathematically, the recovery has to occur. Over the past three years Colorado had one of the worst performing economies in the country. At some point it has to improve and that time is now. The global economy is likely to expand by 4 to 5% this year and U.S. output growth will increase by at least 2.5%. Given that environment and Colorado’s assets, simple mathematics point to sustained job growth.

The country has experienced 7 quarters of heavily-stimulated Real GDP growth (Q1 2011 data has not been released, but it will be positive). Annualized real GDP growth for this period is in the range of 2.8%. Typically, solid job growth occurs when the economy expands at that rate.

As the recession drew to a close, companies increased output per hour at the expense of labor. The rate of productivity gains peaked in 2009 and 2010. The addition of labor will most likely be necessary for companies to experience further output gains.

As a result, the addition of jobs has begun. Nationally, March 2011 marks the sixth consecutive month of job gains. On average, increases for December 2010-March 2011 averaged 158,000 – not great, but a drastic improvement.

The Colorado growth pattern is a little more sporadic. Beginning in February 2010 job gains have occurred in 9 of the past 13 months and 4 of the past six months. While the path to prosperity is a little bumpy, job gains this year will push total state employment back to the 2001 peak.

Last year, healthcare led the state in job creation. At the end of the first quarter, it is projected to be up about 8,800 workers from a year ago.

The good news is that the sector has been joined by tourism, the extractive industries, and the Professional Business Services (PBS) sector for job creation. At the end of the first quarter, the three sectors will add 25,000 to 30,000 net jobs.
Colorado is coming off a solid ski season which, in part, has helped push tourism employment higher by about 8,200 jobs. Increased traffic at DIA points to solid growth in the industry. High gas prices may work to Colorado’s benefit, if it incents the state’s regional market to enjoy less expensive drive vacations to the state this summer.

The extractive industries comprise a small, but important sector because of the severance taxes generated and jobs added in other industries. Year-over-year the sector is about 2,100 workers ahead of the same period last year. Sustained growth is likely to continue, particularly if the Niobrara oil patch proves to be a worthy producer.

The PBS sector has added about 8,200 workers over the past year. It is a mixed blessing that more than 40% of that increase is derived from Employment Services, i.e. temporary help. While these are typically not high paying jobs, gains in this subsector often point to expansion of other areas.

While the state may be at three years from recovering all the jobs lost in the Great Recession, we are finally on the path to that recovery. Sustainable growth, at some level, is on tap for Colorado.

Gap between U.S. and Colorado Unemployment Widens

April 2, 2011May 31, 2014 horvath Leave a comment

The Colorado economy is a lot like the final two weeks of the 2010 Colorado Rockies baseball season – very ugly.

On a positive note, the word on the street is that both are going to be better in the near term (despite at opening day loss in extra innings).

On March 25, the Colorado Office of Labor Market Information (LMI) announced that the statewide seasonally adjusted unemployment rate had risen to 9.3% in February (the non-seasonally adjusted rate was 9.7%). By comparison, the national seasonally adjusted rate dropped further to 8.9%. Prior to January, the last time Colorado’s rate was higher than the U.S. was September 2005.

Seasonally adjusted unemployment rates for the state’s Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) are:
• Boulder 7.3%
• Fort Collins 7.9%
• Denver 9.4%
• Colorado Springs 10.1%
• Greeley 10.7%
• Grand Junction 11.0%
• Pueblo 11.1%.
These metros areas account for about 86% of the Colorado labor force. A majority of the state MSAs have unemployment at or above 9.4%.

There is more to the story…

Through February, year over year, seasonally adjusted data points to weak employment gains of 13,800 workers.

The areas of net job growth are:
• 11,400 Private education and health care
• 8,200 Tourism
• 8,200 Professional business services
• 2,200 Trade, transportation, and utilities
• 2,100 Oil, gas, and mineral extraction
• 800 Personal services
Employment in these 6 sectors is about 63% of all workers and 57.3% of total wages. The increase is about 32,900 workers.

The areas with continued declines are:
• -8,900 Construction
• -3,900 Financial Activities
• -3,200 Information
• -2,600 Government
• -500 Manufacturing
These 5 sectors have shown losses of 19,100.

It is good news that there is an increase in net jobs; however, there are 3 areas of concern:
• The weak level of net job growth is being driven by a reduction in job losses rather than a significant increase in job gains.
• Many of the jobs that are being added are not primary jobs.
• Many of the jobs being added pay lower wages and have less on an impact on the economy.

So, are we headed for continued improvement and another Roctober or lackluster economic growth and another October watching other teams play in the World Series? A few months from now we will have a much better idea where the economy and Rockies are headed.

Michael Porter Highlights Colorado’s Strengths and Weaknesses in New Study

March 8, 2011May 31, 2014 horvath Leave a comment

Harvard Business Professor Michael Porter is widely recognized for his research in the competitiveness of cities, states, regions, and nations. His studies have emphasized clusters, specialized skills, infrastructure, and commerce as distinguishing factors that delineate the prosperity of these areas.

Most recently Porter measured the performance of clusters within each of the states at the National Governors Association Winter Meeting 2011 (February 26). At that meeting he talked about strategies that would allow the states to become more competitive in the future .

In addition, Porter prepared economic profiles for each of the 50 states. The 50-slide PowerPoint presentations, which were released at the NGA meeting, are formatted in a way that allows for easy comparisons between the states.

For example, it is to match Colorado’s biotech cluster against others in the nation. In 2008, Colorado was ranked 25th in biopharmaceuticals, with 2,032 employees and 11th in medical devices with 13,440 workers.

Each presentation begins with a performance snapshot with a position and trend ranking, by quintile, in five key areas. As well, Porter identified the “strong” clusters for each state.

Colorado’s overall prosperity rating was in the second quintile; however, it was rated in the 4th trend quintile. Essentially the state has strong output per capita; however, it is trending downward. This might suggest Colorado’s competitive position might be in jeopardy.

A second area of possible concern is labor mobilization (labor force/civilian population). On a positive note, Colorado is in the top ten; however, it is in the fourth trend quintile. Again, this is a strength that is trending downward.

There is better news for Productivity (average private wages) and Innovation (Patents per 10,000 workers). Colorado was ranked in the second quintile in both strategic categories. From a trend perspective it was also in the second quintile. These are areas where the state has maintained its strengths and remained competitive.

Finally, the state was ranked in the second quintile for cluster strength and in the top trend quintile. This points to increased strength, as defined by greater market share, in its “strong clusters”.

Porter identified Colorado’s top five clusters as:
• Business Services
• Distribution Services
• Entertainment
• Oil and Gas Products and Services
• Aerospace Vehicles and Defense.

The presentation highlights subtle strengths and weaknesses not mentioned in this brief overview. As such, it is recommended reading for any one interested in understanding the opportunities and challenges Colorado might face moving forward.

Colorado’s Bottom-Up Economic Development Strategy

February 11, 2011May 31, 2014 horvath Leave a comment

The first week in February Governor Hickenlooper (call me “John”) hosted the ninth stop in his Bottom-Up Economic Development tour across Colorado. For about two hours, the region’s top economic developers discussed job creation, economic development, and steps for increasing government efficiencies.

The most frequently discussed topic was transportation and the top priority was to complete FasTracks in a timely and cost effective manner. In addition leaders made a case for completion of the final leg of the beltway (between Broomfield and Golden) around the city, expansion of commercial air, maintenance of our bridges and highways, and reduction of congestion along I-70 into ski country.

Panelists felt that innovation and the attraction/retention of primary jobs was critical if we are to maintain our regional and national competitiveness. They also cited the need to have a well-trained workforce and an efficient, accountable, and adequately funded education system. As well, it is imperative that Coloradans work together to maintain the quality of life that makes the state so attractive. This will require leaders to address issues related to our water supplies, develop parks and recreation areas, invest in infrastructure, and utilize the state’s unique assets to attract commerce.

The metro area’s economic diversity was evident as leaders spoke in support of industries and clusters endemic to their region. For example, they addressed the need for the state to be more “military-friendly”, consider construction of nuclear power plants, understand the importance of refineries, realize the value of our construction and extractive industries, and support gaming and tourism.

As the Bottom-Up discussions continue, it would be beneficial to reflect on past economic-development successes. For example, consider the public-private partnership, the former Colorado Advanced Technology Institute (CATI). During the late 1980s, CATI was established to guide the development of science and technology and the growth of select high-tech clusters. Specifically, the group’s work laid the groundwork for the state’s photonics, materials, hardware, software, telecommunications, and bioscience clusters. While it may not be appropriate to resurrect CATI as it existed, there is merit in having the an organization that would fill many of CATI’s roles in fostering long-term growth.

Four years ago, a state job cabinet was formed, town meetings were held across the state to gather input, and plans were put in place. While that effort was well intended, it did not have the desired impact. Hopefully this Bottom-Up Planning approach with be more successful.

A well-thought out economic development plan couldn’t come at a better time. Colorado employment remains below the 2001 peak and it will be years before state payrolls return to the pre-Great Recession high mark.