Denver Accounted for 70% of State’s Job Growth in 2013

In 2013, 68,100 jobs were added, an increase of 2.9% compared to 2012.  By comparison the annualized rate of the state’s job growth was 2.0% for 1990 to 2013.

Just over 70% of the jobs added were in the Denver MSA.

Between 1900 and 2013, Denver (1.8%) and Pueblo (1.3%) added jobs at annualized rates below the average for the state (2.0%). The other five MSAs added jobs at faster rates than the state:

  • Greeley, 2.9%.
  • Fort Collins, 2.6%.
  • Grand Junction, 2.4%.
  • Colorado Springs, 2.2%.
  • Boulder, 2.1%.

The Denver and Boulder MSAs had growth patterns similar to the state, while the growth patterns for the other 5 MSAs were different. For example, the Greeley and Mesa MSAs patterns were different because of oil and gas activity.

The recovery from the Great Recession was led by Fort Collins and Greeley, followed by Boulder and Denver – then Pueblo. Grand Junction and Colorado Springs have not returned to 2008 peak employment.

 

State's job growth for 2013 by MSA
Seventy percent of states’ job growth in Denver MSA.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Colorado Added 68,100 Jobs in 2013

The Bureau of Labor Statistics recently released the preliminary employment revisions for 2013. The data showed that Colorado added 68,100 jobs in 2013, an increase of 2.9% compared to 2012.

  • Growth was led by Construction; Accommodations and Food Services; and Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (PST).
  • None of the Supersectors lost jobs in 2013.
  • Several organizations were reclassified in the NAICS system during the year. They were moved from private health care and local government sectors to state government. This created artificial or structural levels of change for these 3 sectors.

The number of jobs added in 2013 was the 11th strongest year the state in terms of absolute job growth; however, it was only the 39th best year in terms of relative job growth.

After declines in employment in 2009 and 2010, Colorado added:

  •  36,300 jobs in 2011.
  •  54,400 jobs in 2012.
  •  68,100 jobs in 2013.

Job growth is expected to continue in 2014 at a rate similar to last year.

 

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Year-End Colorado County Unemployment Rates for 2013 Range from 3.2% to 12.3%

The year-end 2013 state unemployment rates were recently released and Colorado posted a not-seasonally adjusted (NSA) rate of 5.9%.

The county unemployment rates were the lowest in:

  •  Yuma 3.2%
  •  Cheyenne 3.2%
  •  Kiowa 3.3%.

The metro counties with the lowest rates were:

  • Boulder 4.4%
  • Larimer 4.8%
  • Broomfield 5.3%

The county unemployment rates weret he highest in:

  •  Costilla 12.3%
  •  Saguache 10.3%
  • Huerfano 10.2%

The metro counties with the highest rates were:

  •  Pueblo 8.6%
  •  El Paso 7.2%
  •  Mesa 6.9%

 county unemployment rate

The NSA year-end county unemployment rates  are listed below.
 

County

%

County

%
Adams County 6.5   Kit Carson County 3.8
Alamosa County 7.0   La Plata County 4.7
Arapahoe County 5.7   Lake County 5.5
Archuleta County 7.0   Larimer County 4.8
Baca County 3.5   Las Animas County 9.0
Bent County 7.5   Lincoln County 4.0
Boulder County 4.4   Logan County 4.7
Broomfield County 5.3   Mesa County 6.9
Chaffee County 5.6   Mineral County 6.8
Cheyenne County 3.2   Moffat County 5.2
Clear Creek County 5.3   Montezuma County 7.0
Conejos County 9.3   Montrose County 8.5
Costilla County 12.3   Morgan County 5.2
Crowley County 9.6   Otero County 8.0
Custer County 6.6   Ouray County 4.9
Delta County 7.3   Park County 6.0
Denver County 6.2   Phillips County 4.0
Dolores County 6.4   Pitkin County 5.8
Douglas County 4.7   Prowers County 5.0
Eagle County 5.2   Pueblo County 8.6
El Paso County 7.2   Rio Blanco County 4.7
Elbert County 4.6   Rio Grande County 8.6
Fremont County 8.1   Routt County 4.5
Garfield County 5.8   Saguache County 10.3
Gilpin County 5.4   San Juan County 6.4
Grand County 4.6   San Miguel County 5.0
Gunnison County 5.5   Sedgwick County 4.1
Hinsdale County 3.4   Summit County 4.1
Huerfano County 10.2   Teller County 6.9
Jackson County 3.6   Washington County 4.0
Jefferson County 5.4   Weld County 6.1
Kiowa County 3.3   Yuma County 3.2

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Relief at the Pump – Coloradans Saved $56 in 2013!

Back in the day… a Hershey’s candy bar cost a nickel and a person needed a dime to get a Coke from the vending machine. (Diet Coke didn’t exist). Nickels and dimes had value back in the day.

And…it cost $.21 for a gallon of gasoline. Not only that, an attendant filled up the car, checked the oil, and washed the windows. Back in the day a car was taken to a service station, not a gas station.

Given that perspective, the current relief at the pump is still painful.

As we ring out the old year and ring in the new it is now possible to compare the annual costs of gas for Colorado and the U.S. This calculation assumes that 15 gallons of gas were purchased each week at the average price for all blends. The comparison follows:

  • Colorado
    • The 2013 cost was $2,706.
    • The 2012 cost was $2,762.

It cost $56 less to purchase gas in Colorado during 2013 than 2012.

  • United States
    • The 2013 cost was $2,782.
    • The 2012 cost was $2,874.

It cost $92 less to purchase gas in the U.S. during 2013 than 2012.

In 2013 it cost $76 less to purchase gas in Colorado than the U.S.

How is that for relief at the pump?

If you are a Coloradan, how did you spend the $56 dollars you saved in 2013?
©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Lola and Sir Germs-a-Lot Play a Role in Better Dental Care for Colorado Children

The Denver Post recently reported that about 335,000 Medicaid adults will gain access to dental care in the spring of 2014 and tens of thousands will be added to insurance rolls through Obamacare. In addition, there may be thousands of privately insured children who will have access to dental care as a result of the state health exchange.

The good news is that benefits will be available to more state residents. Surveys indicate that more than 30% of Colorado adults haven’t seen a dentist in the past year, and 20% to 25% of children have high levels of decay-inducing bacteria.

The bad news is there will not likely be enough dentists to service the new patients. Quite often, dentists are not willing to service the patients because of the bureaucracy, paperwork, and lack of revenue from the government funded programs.

Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows Colorado had about 2,700 dental establishments in 2012. The Post article indicated there are about 3,600 dentists, based on statewide surveys and licensure records. Only about 1,000 are actively enrolled as Medicaid providers.

To address this challenge the article indicated the Colorado Dental Association is encouraging its members to accept at least 5 Medicaid patients in 2014. While CDA is to be commended for their efforts, the initial impact will be minimal. To improve overall access there is a pressing need to minimize the hassle of dealing with the state and federal programs.

Other approaches to address the shortage of dentists focus on prevention.

Special interest groups have taken a somewhat draconian approach to addressing the issue of dental hygiene by waging a war on sodas, sugar drinks, boxed cereal, and other foods with heavy sugar content. These efforts include such measures as lobbying for increased taxation on targeted foods and advocating boycotts and reduced availability of them.

A logical approach includes efforts to educate youngsters about the values of good dental hygiene. This includes programs and demonstrations by dentists and dental hygienists to advise younger patients about the benefits of caring for their teeth and how to do that in a disciplined manner.

 

As well it includes fun, educational products such as the recently published children’s book, Lola and Sir Germs-a-Lot (Available on Amazon.com and Xlibris.com). The book tells a story of a young girl who became complacent about brushing her teeth – and she paid the price. Most parents and children can relate to Lola’s exploits. The author’s subtle approach provides a gentle reminder that kids must brush their teeth on a regular basis.

The bottom line is that proper dental hygiene is important to everybody and there are not enough dentists. Improved dental hygiene is a function of better diets, better prevention, and better access to quality dental care. Just ask Lola!

Sources: The Denver Post (“Flood of new dental patients in Colorado meets trickle of caregivers” November 29, 2013); Bureau of Labor Statistics.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Colorado Jobs Data for October – Mixed Message

The recent BLS jobs report for Colorado had mixed news.

The good news is that Colorado will see solid job growth this year. The bad news is that jobs are being added at a slower rate than earlier in the year.

On the street, most Colorado business owners are not pleased with government leadership, but they are generally upbeat about the economy.

The unemployment rate was flat from February through August. The slight declines in September and October are a sign that the rate continues to slowly move downward. BLS reports the state rate is lower than the rate for the U.S.; however, it is not statistically different than the U.S. (The latest state rate is 6.8% compared to 7.3% for the U.S.)

On a positive note, the number of unemployed workers has fallen to 185,500. This is the lowest number of unemployed since February 2009; however, it is more than twice the pre-recession number.

The wage and salary data is mostly positive. The average number of jobs added for the first 10 months of 2013 is about 56,400 greater than the same period last year. Unfortunately, jobs have been added at a declining rate since March.

Colorado is on track to add about 55,000 jobs for 2013, an increase of 2.3%. The question is, “Given this downward trend in the number of jobs being added, what lies ahead for 2014?”

All jobs are important; however, there is concern there are too few jobs being added that “create” other jobs or bring in wealth from the outside. The lack of a sufficient number of new primary jobs may be the reason for the decreasing rate of growth. State and local economic developers are working hard to address this issue.

It is unlikely the state numbers were noticeably impacted by the September flooding and the limited Government shutdown. The flooding clearly had a negative impact on the local economies and the limited government shutdown may have caused inconvenience for cities and companies that are heavily dependent on federal funding. These events will likely have a greater impact on overall output than employment.

For the most part, the latest jobs report bodes well for the state.


©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Pain at the Pump – Will it be Less in 2013?

Since 2009 Americans have felt the pain at the pump. The angst for Coloradans has been slightly less.

For the past 52 weeks, the average cost to purchase 15 gallons of gas per week was $2,760. Believe it or not, this was about $1 more than the previous 52 weeks, not adjusted for inflation.

As well, the cost for Coloradans was about $111 less than the U.S. total for the past 52 weeks.

Sticker shock wasn’t as bad as it was two years ago. This is good news for consumers, but not so good news for the companies who rely on higher oil prices and governments who rely on severance and other taxes for revenue.


©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Amendment 66 Results – Address School Reform in a Sensible Manner

Education of our youth is critical to the growth of the economy!

Yet, Coloradans voted down Amendment 66, a proposal to raise taxes by nearly $1 billion to fund reforms in K-12 education.

Colorado voters support education, but Amendment 66 was overwhelmingly rejected for reasons that did not directly relate to the education of our youth:

  • The Amendment would have become a drag on the state economy. It was not economically viable.
  • Supporters conveniently misrepresented how Amendment 66 would benefit students.
  • Other supporters portrayed the current K-12 system as being broken – there are problems, but it is not broken.
  • As the campaign unfolded, the Colorado Education Association’s support of the amendment was clouded by the possibility CEA would file a lawsuit that would undermine elements of Amendment 66 if it passed.
  • A surprising number of educators did not support it.
  • Supporters of the amendment received over $10 million to run their campaign, including significant funding from out of state.
  • LOTS of money was thrown at the school board race in Adams County. A week before the election, it was disclosed that one of the candidates, Amy Speer, was not eligible to run for her position because she didn’t live in the district she sought to represent.

As the campaign progressed, Amendment 66 supporters became more desperate and their credibility dwindled. Supporters tried to shame the Colorado electorate into voting for Amendment 66 because it was for “the good of the kids”. That was insulting!

When official votes are tallied, Amendment 66 is projected to lose 65% to 35%. To put the vote in perspective:

  • In the 1964 presidential election Lyndon Johnson received 61.1% of the votes and Barry Goldwater received 38.5%.
  • In the 2002 Colorado gubernatorial race, Bill Owens received 62.6% of the votes and Rolliie Heath received 33.7%.
  • Eleven states voted to secede from the state of Colorado. Five of the 11 states voted to secede; however, Weld County turned it down by a vote of 58%-42% and the state remains whole. Said differently, there was a greater likelihood of 11 states seceding than A66 passing.
  • Amendment 66 received a majority of votes in only 2 of 64 counties -it won by slight margins in Boulder and Denver.
  • Amendment 66 lost by 60+% in 55 of 64 counties.

The loser in the race was not the kids, the state of Colorado, nor a few politicos.

Amendment 66 left the Colorado electorate with a bad taste in their mouth for the education process, the teaching profession, and those who advocate for improved funding or school reform. It time to address school reform in a sensible manner.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

September Jobs Report Shows Jobs Added at Slower Pace

Colorado’s average employment through August is 58,500 jobs greater than the same period last year. After a strong first quarter, the rate of job gains has tapered off slightly.

About 64% of total jobs are added in the top five sectors:

  • 11,500 jobs   Accommodations and Food Services
  • 7,300 jobs     Health Care
  • 6,800 jobs     Construction
  • 6,200 jobs     Administrative and Waste Management, excluding employment services
  • 5,400 jobs     Retail Trade

The Leisure and Hospitality sector has added about one-in-four jobs.  The L&H sector includes:

  • Accommodations and Food Services
  • Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation.

Primary jobs/high-tech-related sectors added about 10.7% of total jobs:

  • 4,900 jobs   Professional, Scientific, and Technical
  • 1,100 jobs   Corporate Headquarters (MCE)
  • 900 jobs      Manufacturing
  • -900 jobs     Information.

Cber.co tracks 22 sectors of the economy. Growth is broad-based and 19 are adding workers.

The following sectors have been flat or they posted minimal gains: Transportation, Warehousing, and Utilities; Financial Activities; and State Government, excluding Higher Education.

The three sectors showing jobs losses are:

  • -1,300 jobs    Federal Government
  • -900 jobs       Information
  • -600 jobs       Natural Resources.

Combined, these three sectors have lost 2,800 jobs in the first eight months of 2013 compared to the same period last year.

At this point, it appears that total state employment will be in the range of 55,000 to 60,000 for 2013. This is slightly higher than the Cber.co forecast.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Impact of Flooding on Colorado – Too Great to Measure

The words “widespread massive flooding” are seldom associated with Colorado, especially in the month of September. Annual precipitation, including rain and snow, for the state ranges between 7 and 33 inches per year, with the mountain communities receiving higher amounts. Unfortunately the rains hit this past week and areas of the state surpassed their annual total in less than 48 hours. Unlike a tornado or a fire that is more localized, the flooding has touched 14 counties throughout the state.

As the clouds began to part and the sun peaked out, thoughts turned from dealing with this natural disaster, to recovery, and understanding what its impact will be on the state economy. This brief commentary deals with the latter.

There are many factors to consider when measuring the costs of damage or the economic impact of a natural disaster, such as fire, flooding, blizzards, hail storms, drought, or tornadoes. The overall impact includes human costs, time, damage to infrastructure, impact on the private sector, impact on individuals and the benefactors.

Human Costs – Without a doubt, it is impossible to measure the human costs associated with the flooding. This includes loss of lives, personal injuries, and the loss of homes or irreplaceable personal property. While it is possible to replace material goods (damaged carpet, cars, landscaping) it is not possible to replace photo albums, heirlooms, or other property with sentimental value. The human costs also include the psychological challenges associated with the disaster and the recovery.

Time – As well, it is impossible to measure the countless hours that businesses, nonprofits, government agencies, volunteers, and victims will spend dealing with the direct and indirect impacts of the storms. Those hours would normally be spent producing goods, providing services, or putting food on the table for the family.

Infrastructure – Towns have been submerged in water, roads and bridges have been washed out and utility systems (water, gas, electricity, and communications) have been damaged. In time they will be repaired.

The larger communities have a stronger asset base that will allow them to more effectively deal with the recovery than smaller or rural areas. In many instances, communities will receive state and federal funds to rebuild their infrastructure. The down side is that those funds may only cover a portion of the damage.

Private Sector – The flooding will disrupt the operations, increase the expenses, and reduce the productivity of many businesses. Money that might have been spent on pay increases, product development, or promotion may now have to be allocated to repairs. Even though state or federal assistance may be available for small businesses, they will be hit the hardest and many will not have adequate insurance coverage or other resources to keep their doors open.

Individuals – The hardest hit group will be the individual citizens. Many simply will not have the insurance or resources to cover the expenses to their property. This will be particularly true in rural areas, where expenses may include damage to houses, barns, septic tanks, cesspools, roads, propane tanks, solar panels, farm equipment, or livestock.

For many individuals this is a zero sum game. Money that would have been spent to improve their quality of life will now be spent to maintain it or return it to its previous level.

Income that would have been spent in restaurants, on clothing, or other discretionary items will now be used to replace carpet in the basement, repair damage caused by a leaking roof, or purchase a new vehicle because their water damaged one is no longer useable.

The Benefactors – At the risk of sounding insensitive (and that is not the intent), there will be industries that temporarily benefit from this natural disaster. The obvious benefactors are the home repair, furnishing, financing, and construction industries. At the same time there may be a temporary decline in other business sectors.

The Costs and Impact – At some point, officials will estimate the cost of the damage and the economic impact associated with the storm and flooding. The estimated tally will be in the hundreds of millions. Unfortunately, that total will not capture the long term impact the flooding will have on the individuals or the unexpected changes it has brought to the lives of many Colorado residents.

Colorado residents are resilient. Best wishes to those who have been impacted and to those who are helping restore life for the victims.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.