Pain at the Pump – Will it be Less in 2013?

Since 2009 Americans have felt the pain at the pump. The angst for Coloradans has been slightly less.

For the past 52 weeks, the average cost to purchase 15 gallons of gas per week was $2,760. Believe it or not, this was about $1 more than the previous 52 weeks, not adjusted for inflation.

As well, the cost for Coloradans was about $111 less than the U.S. total for the past 52 weeks.

Sticker shock wasn’t as bad as it was two years ago. This is good news for consumers, but not so good news for the companies who rely on higher oil prices and governments who rely on severance and other taxes for revenue.


©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Manufacturing is Critical to Colorado

Manufacturing is important to the Colorado economy for a variety of reasons.

From a data perspective, manufacturing is important for the following reasons:

  • 131,989 workers are employed in the sector. This is 5.8% of total employment and 7.0% of all private sector jobs.
  • There are 5,280 manufacturing establishments. This is 3.1% of all firms, public and private.
  • Total annual wages are $8.2 billion, or 7.2% of total wages and 8.5% of the private sector total.
  •  Average annual wages are $62,237. This is 123.1% of the state average and 122.2% of the private sector average.

The source is the 2012 QCEW data series produced by BLS.

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Government Sector is Top in Output and Jobs for Colorado

All industries are important to the economy for different reasons! Some may generate tax revenue for governments,  they may create jobs, or they might pay higher than average wages. Others may be lifestyle industries or they may be strong producers of output.  By comprehending how industries contribute to the economy, it is possible to better understand how they relate to each other and how they cause an economy to expand or contract.

There are distinct differences between the top 10 Colorado sectors for output and employment.  Government tops both lists. The sectors in green are common to both lists and are particularly important to the Colorado economy.

It is imperative to have public and private leaders who understand that industries are important to the economy for different reasons. They must recognize that some industries create jobs, others generate output, and some produce both.  In Colorado, the following sectors most effectively produce both: Health care; Retail trade; Professional, scientific, and technical; Manufacturing; and Finance and insurance.

2012 Colorado GDP

2012 CES Employment

  1. Government

  1. Government

  2. Real estate and rental and leasing

  2. Health care and social assistance

  3. Professional, scient., and tech..

  3. Accommodations and food services

  4. Information

  4. Retail trade

  5. Manufacturing

  5. Professional, scient., and tech.

  6. Finance and insurance

  6. Administrative and waste management

  7. Health care and social assistance

  7. Manufacturing

  8. Retail trade

  8. Construction

  9. Wholesale trade

  9. Finance and insurance

10. Mining

10. Other services

Source: BLS and BEA.

The top 10 output sectors account for 77.7% of total GDP and the top 10 job sectors account for 81.9% of total employment.

For additional analysis of Colorado employment and output go to the cber.co website.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Colorado Legislative Council and OSPB Optimistic About 2014

On September 20th, both the Colorado Legislative Council (CLC) and the Governor’s Office of State Planning and Budgeting (OSPB) released their quarterly economic updates. Their preliminary look at 2014 is positive.

Highlights from the CLC outlook for 2014 are:
• The unemployment rate will drop to 6.9%.
• 55,400 wage and salary jobs will be added.
• Retail trade sales will increase by 5.4%.
• 35,400 home building permits will be issued.
• Inflation will increase by 3.2%.
In summary, CLC feels the state will continue to add jobs at a similar rate to 2013, but unemployment will not decline substantially. Retail trade sales will show strong growth and there will be a modest increase in home building permits. Inflation may become an issue.

Highlights from the OSPB outlook for 2014 are:
• The unemployment rate will decline to 6.5%.
• 57,500 wage and salary jobs will be added.
• Retail trade sales will increase by 5.4%.
• 37,300 home building permits will be issued.
• Inflation will increase by 2.4%.
Job growth will be similar to 2013, which will lead to a slight decline in unemployment. Retail trade sales will show strong growth and the housing market will post modest gains. Inflation will remain in check.

For more details, check out the CLC quarterly report  and the OSPB report by clicking here. Both groups produce comprehensive economic updates on a quarterly basis. They are “must read” material for anyone interested in the state economy. The reports are released around the 20th of the month in March, June, September, and December.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Despite Solid Job Growth the Number of Unemployed has Dropped Very Little in 2013

This year Colorado is expected to add over 55,000 wage and salary workers, an increase of about 2.5%. This equates to about 4,600 jobs each month.

But there is a downside.

Between January and March of this year the unemployment rate dropped slightly from 7.3% to 7.1%. Since then the rate has moved within the range of 6.9% and 7.1% (see blue line in chart below). These changes are not statistically significant.

The unemployment rate has been stagnant because there has not been a significant change in the size of the labor force or the number of unemployed.

In August, there were 194,068 unemployed workers in Colorado (see red line in chart below). As a point of reference, the lowest number of unemployed prior to the recession was 93,736 in April 2007 and the peak was 245,928 in October 2010.

The number of unemployed workers declined by 6,628 between January and August; however, there was a drop of only 1,561 between March and August. In August 2013 the number of unemployed was 194,068.

Some high tech industries are struggling to find qualified workers, particularly in specialized positions. On the other hand, the unemployment rate in other industries remains in double digits. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that a portion of the sidelined workers do not have the skills or education to fill positions in industries with low unemployment rates.

Clearly, the recovery from the Great Recession created a dysfunctional economy.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

September Jobs Report Shows Jobs Added at Slower Pace

Colorado’s average employment through August is 58,500 jobs greater than the same period last year. After a strong first quarter, the rate of job gains has tapered off slightly.

About 64% of total jobs are added in the top five sectors:

  • 11,500 jobs   Accommodations and Food Services
  • 7,300 jobs     Health Care
  • 6,800 jobs     Construction
  • 6,200 jobs     Administrative and Waste Management, excluding employment services
  • 5,400 jobs     Retail Trade

The Leisure and Hospitality sector has added about one-in-four jobs.  The L&H sector includes:

  • Accommodations and Food Services
  • Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation.

Primary jobs/high-tech-related sectors added about 10.7% of total jobs:

  • 4,900 jobs   Professional, Scientific, and Technical
  • 1,100 jobs   Corporate Headquarters (MCE)
  • 900 jobs      Manufacturing
  • -900 jobs     Information.

Cber.co tracks 22 sectors of the economy. Growth is broad-based and 19 are adding workers.

The following sectors have been flat or they posted minimal gains: Transportation, Warehousing, and Utilities; Financial Activities; and State Government, excluding Higher Education.

The three sectors showing jobs losses are:

  • -1,300 jobs    Federal Government
  • -900 jobs       Information
  • -600 jobs       Natural Resources.

Combined, these three sectors have lost 2,800 jobs in the first eight months of 2013 compared to the same period last year.

At this point, it appears that total state employment will be in the range of 55,000 to 60,000 for 2013. This is slightly higher than the Cber.co forecast.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Impact of Flooding on Colorado – Too Great to Measure

The words “widespread massive flooding” are seldom associated with Colorado, especially in the month of September. Annual precipitation, including rain and snow, for the state ranges between 7 and 33 inches per year, with the mountain communities receiving higher amounts. Unfortunately the rains hit this past week and areas of the state surpassed their annual total in less than 48 hours. Unlike a tornado or a fire that is more localized, the flooding has touched 14 counties throughout the state.

As the clouds began to part and the sun peaked out, thoughts turned from dealing with this natural disaster, to recovery, and understanding what its impact will be on the state economy. This brief commentary deals with the latter.

There are many factors to consider when measuring the costs of damage or the economic impact of a natural disaster, such as fire, flooding, blizzards, hail storms, drought, or tornadoes. The overall impact includes human costs, time, damage to infrastructure, impact on the private sector, impact on individuals and the benefactors.

Human Costs – Without a doubt, it is impossible to measure the human costs associated with the flooding. This includes loss of lives, personal injuries, and the loss of homes or irreplaceable personal property. While it is possible to replace material goods (damaged carpet, cars, landscaping) it is not possible to replace photo albums, heirlooms, or other property with sentimental value. The human costs also include the psychological challenges associated with the disaster and the recovery.

Time – As well, it is impossible to measure the countless hours that businesses, nonprofits, government agencies, volunteers, and victims will spend dealing with the direct and indirect impacts of the storms. Those hours would normally be spent producing goods, providing services, or putting food on the table for the family.

Infrastructure – Towns have been submerged in water, roads and bridges have been washed out and utility systems (water, gas, electricity, and communications) have been damaged. In time they will be repaired.

The larger communities have a stronger asset base that will allow them to more effectively deal with the recovery than smaller or rural areas. In many instances, communities will receive state and federal funds to rebuild their infrastructure. The down side is that those funds may only cover a portion of the damage.

Private Sector – The flooding will disrupt the operations, increase the expenses, and reduce the productivity of many businesses. Money that might have been spent on pay increases, product development, or promotion may now have to be allocated to repairs. Even though state or federal assistance may be available for small businesses, they will be hit the hardest and many will not have adequate insurance coverage or other resources to keep their doors open.

Individuals – The hardest hit group will be the individual citizens. Many simply will not have the insurance or resources to cover the expenses to their property. This will be particularly true in rural areas, where expenses may include damage to houses, barns, septic tanks, cesspools, roads, propane tanks, solar panels, farm equipment, or livestock.

For many individuals this is a zero sum game. Money that would have been spent to improve their quality of life will now be spent to maintain it or return it to its previous level.

Income that would have been spent in restaurants, on clothing, or other discretionary items will now be used to replace carpet in the basement, repair damage caused by a leaking roof, or purchase a new vehicle because their water damaged one is no longer useable.

The Benefactors – At the risk of sounding insensitive (and that is not the intent), there will be industries that temporarily benefit from this natural disaster. The obvious benefactors are the home repair, furnishing, financing, and construction industries. At the same time there may be a temporary decline in other business sectors.

The Costs and Impact – At some point, officials will estimate the cost of the damage and the economic impact associated with the storm and flooding. The estimated tally will be in the hundreds of millions. Unfortunately, that total will not capture the long term impact the flooding will have on the individuals or the unexpected changes it has brought to the lives of many Colorado residents.

Colorado residents are resilient. Best wishes to those who have been impacted and to those who are helping restore life for the victims.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

CDLE Data – Many Have Not Recovered from Great Recession

With great excitement the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment announced that the state’s wage and salary employment finally returned to its peak in 2008.

It took five years for the state to return to the pre-recession employment levels.

Ugh!

A closer look at the unemployment data is even more disturbing. As a result of the downturn, the number of unemployed workers increased by 123,500. To date, this number has only decreased by 51,300. In other words, the number of unemployed workers is 72,200 greater than five years ago.

Clearly, there are many in the state who have not recovered from the Great Recession and the addition of 150,000+ jobs!

For additional details about the performance of the state economy, go to the cber.co website or click here.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Colorado Job Growth Increasing at a Declining Rate

Colorado job gains remained solid in June; however, job growth is increasing at a declining rate. Average employment through June 2013 is 59,000 jobs greater than the same period last year.

If the data is evaluated on a quarterly basis, the number of jobs added leveled off for the period Q4 2012 to Q2 2013. In fact, there was a decrease between Q2 and Q1 of 2013.

Q4 2012   58,600

Q1 2013   61,800

Q2 2013   56,300.

On average, about 4,900 jobs have been added each month for the past three quarters.

For the period Q2 2012 to Q2 2013, the number of jobs added at the national level appears to have reached a plateau. Nationally, there was an increase in the job gains between Q2 and Q1 of 2013.

Q2 2012    2,158,000

Q3 2012    2,217,000

Q4 2012    2,188,000

Q1 2013    2,086,700

Q2 2013    2,177,300.

On average, about 180,500 jobs have been added each month for the past five quarters.

In both cases, the level of job growth is modest and expected to remain that way in the near term.

For additional details about the performance of the state economy, go to the cber.co website or click here.


©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Policy and Prices Impact Output for Extractive Industries – Is Colorado Closed for Business?

The extractive industries are an important and visible part of Colorado’s economy. In 2012, Colorado’s GDP was 1.76% of the U.S. GDP and Colorado’s Mining sector output was 3.58% of the U.S. Mining sector output.  In other words, Colorado’s extractive industries critical components of both the state and the national economy.

Between 1997 and 2012, there were stark differences in the state and national output for the extractive industries and the private sector.

  • The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.3% and the extractive industries were -0.6%.
  • The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 3.1% and the extractive industries grew at a rate of 3.6%.

Nationally sector output trended downward from 1997 to 2005 and trended upward from 2005 to 2009. Between 2009 and 2012, sector output trended downward again.

In Colorado sector output  trended upward from 1997 to 2009; however, it has trended downward since 2009.

  • The annualized rate of growth for U.S. Private Sector Real GDP (sum of all states) was 2.5% and extractive industry output was -2.0%.
  • The compound growth rate for Colorado Private Sector Real GDP was 2.2% and extractive industry output was -4.0%.

The variance in output has been caused by changes in prices, supply and demand, and policy. Recently, the latter has had the most detrimental impact on the industry in Colorado.  Policy and anti-fracking efforts are likely to further suppress output in the months ahead. In addition to reducing output, this will create the perception that Colorado is not a business-friendly state.


©Copyright 2011 by CBER.