Category: Colorado Economy

Colorado Job Creation Remains Lackluster

horvath Leave a comment

The recent release of the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Business Dynamics (BDM) dataset shows that Colorado job creation remains weak.

Unlike other job statistics, which report the change in net jobs, the BDM statistics measure gross job gains and gross jobs lost. The data is derived from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, which explains why the lag in reporting is about 7 to 9 months.

Gross job gains were weak during 2010 and 2011, averaging 127,691 for the eight quarters. During the 7 previous quarters (Q2 2008 through Q4 2009), average quarterly gains were 124,895. This period included much of the 2007 recession. On average, gross job gains have been about the same for the period 2007 through 2011.

For the eight quarters in 2010 and 2011, average job losses were 120,452. By comparison, average job losses were 148,913 for the seven prior quarters (Q2 2008 through Q4 2009).

For 2010 and 2011, net job gains were primarily a result of reduced jobs losses and weak job gains. A variety of factors are responsible for this lack of job creation and ultimately the slow recovery.

In the chart below:
Heavy horizontal blue lines represent average gross gains for the period.
Heavy horizontal red lines represent average losses for the period.
Light blue lines represent quarterly totals (same as previous charts).
Light red lines represent quarterly totals (same as previous charts).

For additional information on the Colorado go to https://cber.co/CBEReconomy.html.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Unemployment Isn’t the Same for Everybody

horvath Leave a comment

This past month Coloradans took special notice when the unemployment rate was announced because it matched the U.S. rate. The July seasonally adjusted rate for both was 8.3%.

In July, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that there were 13.4 million unemployed Americans, based on the non-seasonally adjusted rate (NAR) of 8.6%. This is slightly higher than the more frequently publicized seasonally adjusted rate (SAR) of 8.3%.

A closer look at the data shows distinct differences based on demographics and geography.

Gender
• 6.9 million men unemployed with a NAR of 8.2%.
• 6.5 million women unemployed with a NAR of 9.0%.

Race
• .5 million unemployed Asians with a NAR of 6.2%.
• 9.5 million unemployed Whites with a NAR of 7.6%.
• 2.8 million unemployed African-Americans with a NAR of 15.0%.

Ethnic Origins
• 2.5 million unemployed Latinos with a NAR of 10.3%.

Age Groups
• 4.0 million unemployed, 16-24 years old, with a NAR of 17.1%.
• 2.8 million unemployed, 25-34 years old, with a NAR of 8.3%.
• 2.2 million unemployed, 35-44 years old, with a NAR of 6.8%.
• 2.3 million unemployed, 45-54 years old, with a NAR of 6.6%.
• 1.5 million unemployed, 55-64 years old, with a NAR of 6.3%.
• .5 million unemployed, 65+ years old, with a NAR of 7.2%.

Marital Status
• 4.4 million unemployed married people, spouse present with a NAR of 5.4%.
Despite a steady recovery, there are segments of the population that have not found jobs.

Geographic rates are available for Colorado. In July both the NAR and SAR were coincidently 8.3%.

Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)
• The NARs for the Boulder and Fort Collins MSAs were less than 8.3%
• The NAR for the Denver-Aurora-Broomfield MSA was 8.3%.
• The NARs for the Pueblo, Colorado Springs, Greeley, and Grand Junction MSAs were greater than 8.3%.

Counties (Most recent data is June 2012).
• Colorado has 64 counties, 25 have NARs greater than the state average and 1 has a NAR equal to the state rate.

• Seventeen of Colorado’s counties are part of the MSAs. Seven of the 17 have NARs greater than the state average.
• Of the 47 rural counties, 28 have NARs less than the state average, 1 has a rate equal to the state NAR, and 18 have NARs below the state average.
• Most of the rural counties with higher than average unemployment rates are on the Western Slope or the south/southwest part of the state.

Cities with populations greater than 25,000 people (Most recent data is June 2012).
• The NARs for Arvada, Boulder, Broomfield, Castle Rock, Fort Collins, Lafayette, Longmont, Loveland, Parker, and Westminster were less than 8.3%
• The NAR for Lakewood was 8.3%.
• The NARs for Aurora, Brighton, Centennial, Colorado Springs, Commerce City, Denver, Englewood, Fountain, Grand Junction, Greeley, Northglenn, Pueblo, Thornton, and Wheat Ridge.

While the state has been steadily adding jobs for two years, there are clearly parts of the state where the economy has not recovered.

For additional information on the Colorado go to https://cber.co/CBEReconomy.html.

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Colorado State Government Employment Bucks National Trend

horvath Leave a comment

Across the country, state governments are slashing budgets and cutting the size of their state workforce. That is not the case in Colorado.

State employment has two components: Higher Education and State Government. Over the past two years, cber.co has reported how the Higher Education workforce has grown for the past decade.

As can be seen in the chart below, Colorado State Government employment (excluding higher education) has reported steady growth since 2004. This is contrary to the trend for the aggregate total of all states.

What lies ahead for state workers? Are these increases justified? Will the Governor continue to add workers to his team over the next year as revenues increase? What makes Colorado different from other states? Will state jobs reliant on federal funding be trimmed as adjustments are made to the federal budget? If the state population increases by 80,000 to 100,000 people every year, won’t it be necessary to add state workers to provide essential services for them? Will the state experience a post recession drop off in workers, as was the case in 2002-2004? How will the elections impact the future of the size of Colorado’s government?

Two sources are recommended for tracking the fortunes of the Colorado State Government: the Governor’s Office of State Planning and Budgeting and the Colorado Legislative Council provide quarterly updates of the state economy and finances.

To learn more about the challenges facing government leaders across the country, read The Report of the State Budget Crisis Task Force. The report focuses on six states but illustrates problems that exist in Colorado.

For additional information on the Colorado go to https://cber.co/CBEReconomy.html.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Colorado Unemployment Rate Up for Fourth Month in a Row

horvath Leave a comment

The Colorado unemployment rate rose for the fourth consecutive month and reached 8.3%. While the BLS indicated that this increase was not statistically significant, it is certainly significant to incumbents seeking re-election in November.

The unemployment rate is a metric that the public pays attention to. They view it as a sign that the economy is not improving – as promised. Specifically, more than 225,000 people are unemployed in Colorado.  The never-ending talk about the fiscal cliff, additional easing by the Federal Reserve, and other doom and gloom projections add to the concerns of the electorate and the woes of incumbents.
The increase to 8.3% is significant for another reason. This is the second consecutive month that the state unemployment rate has matched the U.S. Over the past decade, the Colorado rate has often been a half to a full point lower than the U.S. rate. Seldom has Colorado’s rate been equal to or higher than the nation.

The basic reason for the rise in the rate is that the size of the labor pool increased. In other words, a greater number of people began looking for jobs. Even though the public and private sector have been adding jobs for the past two years, they aren’t being added fast enough to absorb all of the interested workers.

On a positive note, initial job claims are declining. That means there are fewer layoffs.

Continuing claims are also trending downwards – ever so slowly. That means people are either finding work or their benefits have expired. The former is a positive sign, while the latter is not.

The most recent data release shows that after seven months, an average of 40,000 jobs have been added, or about 3,300 jobs per month. Two factors could cause 2012 employment to be less than 2011 (Last year the state added 33,000 jobs).

BLS periodically and systematically revises the unemployment and employment data. Revisions to the data could push the 2012 total downward (an upward revision is unlikely).

As well, there could be a downturn in employment. If employment drops to a monthly average of 23,000 for the last five months then the annual total would be 33,000, or the same as 2011.

The good news is that gross job losses appear have declined, there has been a slight increase in gross job gains, and more people are looking for work. While this scenario is not ideal, it is much better than having a rise in the unemployment rate caused by a drop off in gross job gains and an uptick in gross job losses.

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Slow Retail Trade Recovery Reflects Problems Elsewhere

horvath Leave a comment

Retail trade sales are critical to state and local governments because taxes from sales provide significant revenue. In the case of local governments, sales tax revenue may account for two-thirds of total funding.

The chart (below) shows cumulative retail trade sales from 2008 through the first four months of 2012. The chart shows how sales dropped off in 2009 and 2010, but returned to 2008 levels in 2011. The data is not adjusted for inflation, so the recovered is slightly lengthier than shown in the chart. (The CPI for Colorado for these years is 3.9% for 2008; -0.6% for 2009; 1.9% for 2010; 3.7% for 2011, and 2.5% is estimated for 2012.)

Retail trade data for the first four months of 2012 show that sales are about 2.2% ahead of the 2008 four-month level and 7.7% above the 2011 four-month level. If the latter growth rate is maintained for the final eight months of the year, retail trade sales will exceed $71 million in 2012.

For additional details on the economy click here or go to https://cber.co/

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Goods Producing Sectors Poised to Add Jobs this Year

horvath Leave a comment

Companies are divided into two categories: Goods Producing sectors and Service Producing sectors. In simplistic terms: you make stuff or you do stuff.

One of the reasons the Goods Producing category is important is that many primary jobs are in these sectors. The NAICS categories include the Extractive Industries, Construction, and Manufacturing.

Only twice (1997 and 1998) since 1990 have all three sectors added jobs in the same year. At the midpoint of 2012, the trio are in a position to show gains for this year also. Previously the gains were a result of an economy hitting on all cylinders. This time the gains will occur because of an economy that has misfired and the sectors have nowhere else to go but up. They are playing a small, but extremely important role in the recovery.

For additional details on the Colorado economy click here or go to https://cber.co/.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Did the State Really Lose 6,900 Jobs in June?

horvath Leave a comment

It has been a tough summer for Colorado. There have been budgetary problems, wildfires, and shootings. At a time when state leaders have been touting how the state is recovering from the recession at a faster rate than the nation, The Bureau of Labor Statistics has announced that the state has shed 6,900 jobs (Seasonally Adjusted – SA) in June.

The non-seasonally adjusted (NSA) data for June tells a story that more closely reflects business activity on the street. A review of the second quarter for the past four years is shown below:

• 2009 2,252,500 workers
• 2010 2,226,100 workers, a decrease of 26,400 workers over Q2 in the prior year.
• 2011 2,257,100 workers, an increase of 31,000 workers over Q2 in the prior year.
• 2012 2,289,400 workers, an increase of 32,300 workers over Q2 in the prior year.

Another way to look at the July Colorado data is to think about the national employment data published in early July. It showed the nation added 80,000 jobs in June. On average, Colorado employment is about 1.7% of the nation’s total.

That means that if Colorado was growing at a rate comparable to the U.S. then the state should have added about 1,400 jobs in June. If Colorado was expanding at a faster rate than the U.S. then 2,000 to 3,000 workers would have been added. Either Colorado is in a lot of trouble or the loss of 6,900 jobs doesn’t make sense.

There are several reasons for this apparent disparity. First, the BLS recently reduced their funding to state agencies, they centralized monthly state estimates, and they revised the monthly employment estimation process with the intent of providing a “better product”. While that process may result in cost savings and greater efficiency within BLS, it appears that some of the monthly data may be less reliable and useful.

As well, the seasonal adjustment factors used to take out the effect of seasonality appear to be unreliable. Over the past decade the performance of the economy has been atypical, thus making it virtually impossible for the seasonal adjustment factors to effectively measure seasonal patterns. In other words, the SA data for June most likely does not reflect what is happening in the economy.

So, what does this mean?

The June data is preliminary. Possible updates may be made in the July, March 2013, and March 2014 revisions. Watch for updates and either work with the NSA data or use the preliminary SA data with caution.

Meanwhile, a review of the NSA data for H1 2012, shows that job growth has tapered off, in line with a project drop-off in growth of U.S. output. With marginally stronger output growth on tap for the second half, it appears the state is in line to add 35,000 to 40,000 jobs this year.

For additional details about the Colorado economy go to https://cber.co/

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Great Recession Continues to Play Havoc with State Finances

horvath Leave a comment

The Great Recession has taken its toll on state and local governments. Three years after the end of the Great Recession state and local governments continue to face significant fiscal challenges. In mid-July The State Budget Crisis Task Force released a report headed up by Richard Ravitch and Paul Volcker that examined the challenges to financial stability for California, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Texas, and Virginia. Just over 36% of the country’s population lives in these six states.

There are a number of variables (policies, economic structure, demographics, etc.) that differentiate the states; however, the report identified six fiscal threats common to each:
• Medicaid spending growth is reducing funds for other needs.
• Federal deficit reduction will result in lower funds for state coffers.
• Underfunded retirement accounts are a risk for future budgets
• Eroding tax bases and volatile tax revenues jeopardize state finances.
• Local government fiscal challenges may impact state budgets.
• State budget laws and practices hinder fiscal stability.

To show the seriousness of the problem the report evaluated changes in tax revenues generated from the peak-to-trough, the trough to 2011, and peak-to-2011. The changes in percentages are adjusted for inflation; however, they are not adjusted for policy changes. In some cases policy changes have been made that have or will positively impact revenues.

The change from peak-to-trough follows:
• U.S.  -12.0%
• California -14.9%
• Illinois  -18.7%
• New Jersey -17.2%
• New York    -4.3%
• Texas  -15.4%
• Virginia -15.9%

The change for the recovery, or trough-to-2011, follows:
• U.S.  +  5.7%
• California +11.9%
• Illinois  +12.9%
• New Jersey +  2.7%
• New York +  4.3%
• Texas  +  7.4%
• Virginia +  3.9%

The change from peak- to-2011, follows:
• U.S.  –  7.0%
• California –  4.8%
• Illinois  –  8.2%
• New Jersey -15.0%
• New York –  0.2%
• Texas  –  9.2%
• Virginia -12.6%

Colorado was not included in the report; however, the challenges faced by the state are similar. Data from the Colorado Legislative Council’s quarterly reports (June) show the following levels in the state’s gross general fund, expressed in billions:
• FY ending June 2008  $7.7
• FY ending June 2009 $6.7
• FY ending June 2010 $6.5
• FY ending June 2011 $7.1
• FY ending June 2012 $7.6
• FY ending June 2013 $7.8
• FY ending June 2014 $8.2

The Colorado data is not inflation adjusted. On an inflation-adjusted basis the level of the state General Fund will not return to the FY 2008 level until FY 2013 or 2014. The Colorado State Demography Office projects that the state population will increase from 4.9 to 5.4 million people for that period. In other words the state will add half a million people and have the same level of funding as five or six years ago.

It is truly a challenging time to be working in the public sector.

Links to the State Budget Crisis site and the Colorado Legislative Council site are:

 

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

U.S. Employment – After Six Months, is the Glass Half Empty or Half Full?

horvath Leave a comment

On July 6th the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the U.S. added 80,000 jobs for the month of June. Employment for May was revised upwards to 77,000.

For the third consecutive year employment started strong, but fizzled. Through the first six months of this year,the nation added about 150,300 jobs a month. This compares to a monthly average of 160,800 jobs in the first half of 2011 and 145,800 jobs during the second half.

Employment increased in manufacturing; professional and business services, health care, and wholesale trade. Other sectors were relatively flat.

If you compare the first half of 2012 to the first half of 2011 (150,300 vs. 160,800), the employment situation is clearly worse this year and fewer jobs will be added this year, i.e. the glass is half empty.

A comparison of the second half of 2012 to the first half of 2011 (145,800 vs. 150,300) shows improvement in 2012.

Given projections for weak, but slightly stronger output growth in the second half, that means the glass is half full.

Nationally, is the glass half-empty or half-full?

On average, Colorado nonfarm employment is about 1.72% of the U.S. total. If Colorado grows at the same pace as the U.S. the July 20th press release will reflect a gain of about 1,400 jobs. At the moment, Colorado is currently recovering from the recession at a slightly faster rate than the U.S. It would not be surprising if Colorado added 2,500 to 3,000 jobs for June.


©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Colorado High Tech Job Growth Flat for Past Year

horvath Leave a comment

Colorado’s high-tech cluster played an essential part in the growth of the state economy for the past 20 years, particularly between 1994 and 2001. At its peak in 2001, it employed more than 216,000 workers, or 9.67% of total employment.

Today that number is roughly 175,000, the same that it was when the recession officially ended in mid-2009.  High-tech employment accounts for 7.67% of total workers.

The cluster, as defined by Colorado’s Labor Market Information agency, actually continued to decline after the recession. It bottomed out in March of 2010 at 169,300 workers. Over the next 15 months more than 6,000 jobs were added and 176,000 high-tech workers were employed in July 2012. Cluster employment has been relatively flat since then.

Colorado’s telecommunications sector continues to experience declines resulting from consolidations. As well, it has recently been announced that Abound Solar is going into bankruptcy, the addition of a proposed General Electric facility will be delayed and another GE facility will reduce its workforce. In addition the Aerospace and Clean Energy Park in Northern Colorado was scrapped. Unfortunately, the volatility associated with the fledgling renewable energy cluster comes as no surprise. Proposed defense cuts could play havoc with the state aerospace industry.

Current projections for Real GDP growth are less than 2.0% for the next year. Continued lackluster job growth in the high-tech sector is likely.

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.