Congress Votes to Slash Funding for Data Producers – Again

Business and government leaders in the U.S. are fortunate to have a wealth of statistical data to guide their policy decisions. For the most part, the programs that produce the data have integrity and they try to provide the best data possible.

Periodically, Congress attempts to eliminate some of the federal government statistical agencies. On May 17th, the National Association of Business Economists distributed emails to members and friends discussing the latest attempt by Congress to reduce funding for key data programs.

While government doesn’t need a blank check to collect information, the data that will allegedly be eliminated is valuable in the decision-making process. Hopefully Congress will find a fund collection and production of the data in an efficient and cost effective manner.

See the NABE communiqué below.


Dear NABE Members and Friends:

Last week, we alerted you that the U.S. House of Representatives was considering an appropriations bill for Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies (H.R. 5326) that would drastically reduce funding for the Census Bureau and make participation in the American Community Survey voluntary. Thanks to the many NABE members and other data users who contacted their representatives to try to prevent this action. Regrettably, the legislation ultimately passed the House along party lines and was much more damaging than originally proposed.  In its current form, H.R. 5326 will “devastate” the nation’s economic statistics.

Specifically, the legislation will:
•Terminate the American Community Survey;
•Cancel the 2012 Economic Census; and
•Halt development of cost-saving measures for the decennial census.

NEXT STEPS:

The Senate is expected to take up its own FY2013 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies appropriations bill shortly. The Senate and House versions of the bill will then presumably be addressed by a conference committee comprised of members of both bodies.

HOW YOU CAN HELP:

Call or email your senators and representative today to tell them why you value the Economic Census and the American Community Survey. You can use this sample letter below:

Dear(Senator/Representative):

I am writing to express my concern over passage of H.R. 5326 by the U.S. House of Representatives, which would drastically cut funding for the U.S. Census Bureau and eliminate the Economic Census and the American Community Survey (ACS) – two of the most important tools we have for understanding the U.S. economy.

These programs are critically important to businesses, policymakers, and government agencies which use the data to make informed decisions and plan for the future. The increased uncertainty accompanying the loss of these data will most certainly result in more missed opportunities and waste for businesses and misallocation of resources by policymakers and government agencies. I urge you to ensure that the Census Bureau receives adequate funding to continue these vital programs.

How are Economic Census data used?
•By the federal government as an input to calculate elements of key economic indicators, such as economic growth (GDP), prices, and productivity;
•By retailers in evaluating whether to expand into new market geographies;
•By economic development commissions in attracting new businesses to their areas; and
•By companies to benchmark performance against industry averages

How are ACS data used?
•By corporations to examine workforce characteristics of neighborhoods to determine optimal locations for new factories or sales centers;
•By homebuilders looking to tailor new subdivisions to surrounding neighborhoods based on income, family size and existing home values; and
•By municipal governments in planning to meet the educational, safety and housing needs of their citizens.

The information we glean from the Economic Census and the ACS increases our understanding of current economic  conditions and reduce uncertainty, allowing businesses and policymakers to make well-informed, efficient decisions.

If we eliminate these programs, we are choosing to “fly blind,” an alarming proposition in these challenging economic times. Again, I urge you that you vote to ensure adequate funding for both the ACS and the Economic Census.

Sincerely,

(Your Name)

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

LEHD and Quickfacts – Commerce City – A Community with Atypical Demographics

Are you a data geek looking for a fix? If so, have you tried the LEHD or Census Quickfacts databases?

The two databases contain information from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. They are combined in a way that allows data geeks, public and private leaders, and others to learn more about their local population and workforce and see what makes their local economy work (or not work).

To illustrate this point, let’s take a look at five examples of information that can be gleaned for Commerce City, Colorado. (Those in the Denver MSA think of Commerce City as the home of the refinery located along Highway 270.)

Example 1
In Colorado 24.5% of the workforce has earnings of $1,250 per month or less, 36.1% have earnings of $1,251 to $3,333 per month, and 39.5% have earnings of more than $3,333 per month.

In Commerce City 17.1% of the workforce has earnings of $1,250 per month or less, 34.2% have earnings of $1,251 to $3,333 per month, and 48.7% have earnings of more than $3,333 per month.

This begs the question, “What industries are driving the higher concentration of earnings in the upper wage category for Commerce City?”

Example 2
In Colorado 50.8% of the workforce is male and 49.2% is female.
In Commerce City 73.7% of the workforce is male and 26.3% is female.

So, why are there more men workers than women in Commerce City? What are the types of jobs that cause that difference?

Example 3
In Colorado 50.1% of the population is male and 49.9% is female.
In Commerce City 50.4% of the population is male and 49.6% is female.

OK? The mix of men and women in Commerce City is split about 50-50, but the workforce (example 2) is not. Where do Commerce City employers find the workers to fill their jobs? Where do the Commerce City women go to work?

Example 4
In Colorado the median value of an owner-occupied home is $236,600
In Commerce City, the median value of an owner-occupied home is $206,600

Earlier we learned that Commerce City has a higher percentage of workers in the upper earnings bracket. If that is the case, then why isn’t the value of the homes higher there? Or do the Commerce City workers in the upper bracket live somewhere other than Commerce City?

Example 5
In Colorado 35.9% of the workforce has a Bachelor’s degree or higher.
In Commerce City 19.8% of the workforce has a Bachelor’s degree or higher.

Again, we previously learned that Commerce City has a higher percentage of workers in the upper earnings bracket. If that is the case, then what types of jobs are they performing that pay well and don’t require a college degree? Or do the people with college degrees live elsewhere and work in Commerce City?

In the matter of minutes it is possible to create a profile about any local community in the United States. Once that sketch of a community is prepared, then another series of probing questions can be asked to address policy decisions regarding social, economic, workforce, or education issues.

What’s the story behind your community? Check out LEHD and Quickfacts to learn more.

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.