It is Time to Bury the Colorado Paradox

Many years ago, the Colorado paradox was contrived as a way to draw attention to Colorado’s low high school graduation rates.

The paradox is explained as follows: Colorado has one of the most highly educated work forces in the country, yet Colorado is at the lower end of the rankings for high school graduation rates.

The two facts have been tied together for the purpose of shaming policy makers for not providing greater, if not unlimited, funding for Colorado education.

The factors that cause Colorado to be a highly educated state are not responsible for the low graduation rates. If anything, there is more likely to be an inverse relationship between these two variables rather than a positive relationship.

It is no accident that Colorado has a highly educated workforce:

  • Many primary jobs have higher statewide multiplier than most jobs. This means the addition of primary jobs (with highly educated people) will result in the addition of many more support jobs (which may not require a high school or college degree).
  • Forty-seven of the 64 counties are rural. They have a lower level of education and an older population. In other words, people older than 50 who have lived in a rural community all their lives are not likely to need a high school or college education degree and they probably won’t get one. This is not a bad thing. Their happiness and success is not determined by their level of education.
  • The Office of Economic Development and International Trade (OEDIT) has actively recruited companies such as Vestas, Sun, Level 3, and Arrow Electronics. There are many jobs at these companies that require bachelor’s degrees. When these companies moved to Colorado, they brought many workers with them, which in turn created jobs for other Coloradans. As these companies became established they have recruited workers from local colleges and universities.
  • Denver has been identified as a city that attracts highly educated younger workers. They want to move to Denver, live in a loft, work at a company in downtown Denver that pays well, play in the mountains, and live in a state where marijuana is legal. The state is appealing to highly educated workers because of the its lifestyle and its mix of companies.
  • The tourism industry (which is part of OEDIT) markets Colorado as a place to live, work, and play. Some of the people who come here to ski, ride bikes, hike, smoke dope, raft, etc. want to come back and live here. If they have the money to visit Colorado, they are likely to be highly educated and able to afford to live here.
  • Many years ago, officials restricted the number of out-of-state students. They have since decided to allow more international and out-of-state students and raise out-of-state rates disproportionately. This has increased the diversity of their student population and has been a significant source of much needed revenue. It has also increased the number of out-of-state college students who decide to stay here and work.
  • Colorado is a small state. The state’s MSAs have colleges, universities, and federal labs that have a high percentage of workers with college degrees. As the population increases, the number of highly educated workers at these facilities will not increase proportionately with the population growth.
  • Even If Colorado had the best education system in the universe, it would be impossible for it to meet the needs of the public and private workforce. During the Go-Go Nineties the state added almost 700,000 net jobs with gains in all sectors, except Natural Resources and Mining. During the Lost Decade, only 8,500 net jobs were added. For that ten year period, there were net job losses in 5 of the 11 sectors. The state has to import talent do deal with the volatility in the workforce caused by fluctuations in the business cycle. For example, an economic case can be made that it is a wiser investment of scarce resources to import 100 machinists than it is to try to build the infrastructure to train them here.

There are many good reasons for importing talent and the state has a lengthy track record of doing that. That is a good thing. At the same time, there are many good reasons for strengthening the education system so the state produces a higher percentage of high school graduates and a greater number of in-state college graduates. That is also a good thing.

It is time to put the fallacious Colorado paradox in the closet with beanie babies, floppy drives, and Nehru jackets.

Have Budget Cuts Negatively Impacted the Public School System?

A complete answer to this question requires more than a couple hundred words and two charts. On a positive note, K-12 jobs are still being added and assessment scores are above the national norm.

Are jobs being added fast enough, i.e. do the number of new teachers match the increase in students? Are teachers being replaced by teacher aides? Are key administrators being replaced by less experienced and knowledgeable staff? Are deserving professionals not receiving appropriate merit increases? Do the number of employees translate into quality education?

Colorado K-12 public education employment has fared better than the U.S. for the past three years. A review of the 12-month rolling average shows that Colorado employment dropped off from mid-2010 to mid-2011, but has added jobs since. On the other hand, U.S. K-12 public education employment has declined since mid-2009. Undoubtedly many Coloradans may feel the situation could be improved, but it appears to be better than the national trend.

Another area to look at is assessment scores, in particular the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). NAEP scores show that Colorado 4th grade scores are in the top 18 states for Reading, Math, and Science. Colorado’s eighth grade scores are in the top 10 states for these same subject areas.

Do strong NAEP scores correlate to high graduation rates? Do they mean students won’t need remedial classes if they take college classes? Are they an indicator that students are being educated to perform basic skills in the workplace?

Based on these two data sets, it appears that Colorado is making an effort to staff their K-12 programs as best as possible and that performance, based on NAEP, is better than the national norm. Arguably, other statistics may show the need for improvement, but data in these two areas suggest that Colorado leaders are taking positive steps in a challenging economic environment to educate our youth.

For additional information on the Colorado go to https://cber.co/CBEReconomy.html.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.