Tag: Great Recession

Chance of Recession Recedes – The Conference Board

horvath Leave a comment

There are signs the economy is improving. The unemployment rate is trending downward, retail sales are trending upward, and manufacturing has added jobs in 2012. For the 220,000+ unemployed Coloradans and those who aren’t captured in the UI numbers, it feels like the Great Recession never ended.

In recent months, The Conference Board (TChad demonstrated an ability to more accurately assess the economy than other groups. As a result, people took notice when they pushed the odds of another downturn up to 52% in October. A short-term historical look at TCB’s chance of recession statistics follows:
• July   17%
• August   33%
• September  45%
• October  52%
• November 32%
• December     9%

It is good news that the November and December percentages dropped off significantly. If a recession had occurred, it would have been short and shallow – barring a major shock. The economy has performed at a subpar level for so long and the recovery has been so weak that there would be little room for further deterioration in the event of another downturn.

Within the past month there has been reason to be more upbeat. Patience will continue to be a virtue as Coloradans weather the recovery.

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

10 Years After 9/11 – Creative Financing Fizzles

horvath Leave a comment

In early 2003 a reporter posed the question, “Looking back, what did you miss in forecasting the 2001 recession?” In hindsight, there were two signals of greater problems.

1. Colorado construction output began to decline in 2001.
2. Employment in the Colorado Financial Activities Sector moved counter to total employment during the 2001 recession.

At that time, it was difficult to understand these trends because they were not fully developed. In the months prior to 9/11, the economy had slowed, but remained strong. Very few noticed the slowdown in construction output and those who did thought it to be nothing more than a bump in the road.

By mid-decade it became more apparent that the strength of the construction industry was waning. T-Rex was winding down and the only major activity was a smaller highway project in Colorado Springs, the Comanche Power Plant in Pueblo, and a mixture of school construction additions or improvements. In addition, housing permits, and valuation began to level off.

By 2007, housing construction began to slip and by 2008 it was clear that the industry was faced with more than a “bump in the road”. Between 2007 and 2009, 1-in-6 of the private sector jobs lost were either in construction or construction-related industries.

In hindsight, more economists and bank officials should have questioned why employees were being added in the Financial Activities Sector during a downturn. When 9/11 occurred, the economy came to a grinding halt for several days. Americans were encouraged to keep spending in hopes the country could consume its way out of the recession. At the time, that seemed to be the right thing to do.

Creative financing products (HELOCS, 0% financing, interest only loans, reverse mortgages, and others) were designed to stimulate consumption. Demand for these products increased in popularity because they allowed Americans to purchase whatever they wanted. To meet that demand, financial employment expanded between 2000 and 2007.

In 2007 a series of problems began to surface, the popularity of these products dropped off, and employment in the sector reversed trend – sharply. The industry experienced a complete melt-down – collapse of large financial institutions, the bailout of major banks by national governments, bank consolidations and closures, declines in consumer wealth, failure of top businesses, volatile equity markets, declining property values, foreclosures and evictions, and much lower interest rates.

In hindsight it is now easy to see that in 2002 there were signals that greater problems lay ahead. Given the circumstances, it is also easy to see why we looked past those warnings.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Concentration of State Construction Workers Declining

horvath Leave a comment

Colorado Construction employment peaked in 2006 and has been on a downward path since. Not seasonally adjusted data topped 175,000 jobs in 2006. Today, there are 102,000 workers, comparable to mid-1995.

The large number of foreclosures and reduction in housing prices brought the construction of single family housing to a screeching halt. Approximately 9,500 permits will be pulled in 2011, up from the trough in 2009 (7,231). This is a far cry from the peak in 2004 (40,753).

Because it is difficult for geographically large states to develop distinctive competencies in construction, the concentration or workers, or location quotient (LQ), should be near 1.0. (A location quotient is the ratio. It is the percentage of state construction workers divided by the percentage of U.S. construction workers).

A LQ greater than 1.0 indicates a higher concentration of construction workers, much as the state has had for the past 20 years. On the other hand, a LQ less than 1.0 means Colorado has less of a concentration, much as occurred at the end of the 1980s because of overbuilding.

The state LQ for construction workers remained below 1.0 through mid-1991. It increased for the next 10 years (2001) to about 1.5. In early 2001, the LQ began declining and dropped off sharply for three years (2004). It leveled off for five years, then plummeted again in 2009.

How low will the LQ go? In theory it is reverting to 1.0. As the country recovers from the Great Recession, other sectors will expand at a faster, thus driving the LQ lower. It will rise again when Colorado experiences another strong expansionary phase.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

The Employment Recession Has Finally Ended

horvath Leave a comment

When the NBER officially announced the end of the Great Recession, the general reaction was, “Oh really?” It was clear to most that while the technical recession was over, the employment recession was not.

More recently, it has been announced that the employment recession has ended, although unemployment remains high. In the case of Colorado, the rate has reached record levels and is higher than the U.S. Again, the general reaction has been, “Oh really?”

Yes, the country is in expansion mode again. (The unemployment rate is dismal, but it is a lagging indicator.)

There are clearly risks to the continued expansion; however, sufficient momentum appears to be in place to sustain growth in the near-term. Arguments supporting the expansion follow…

Mathematically, the recovery has to occur. Over the past three years Colorado had one of the worst performing economies in the country. At some point it has to improve and that time is now. The global economy is likely to expand by 4 to 5% this year and U.S. output growth will increase by at least 2.5%. Given that environment and Colorado’s assets, simple mathematics point to sustained job growth.

The country has experienced 7 quarters of heavily-stimulated Real GDP growth (Q1 2011 data has not been released, but it will be positive). Annualized real GDP growth for this period is in the range of 2.8%. Typically, solid job growth occurs when the economy expands at that rate.

As the recession drew to a close, companies increased output per hour at the expense of labor. The rate of productivity gains peaked in 2009 and 2010. The addition of labor will most likely be necessary for companies to experience further output gains.

As a result, the addition of jobs has begun. Nationally, March 2011 marks the sixth consecutive month of job gains. On average, increases for December 2010-March 2011 averaged 158,000 – not great, but a drastic improvement.

The Colorado growth pattern is a little more sporadic. Beginning in February 2010 job gains have occurred in 9 of the past 13 months and 4 of the past six months. While the path to prosperity is a little bumpy, job gains this year will push total state employment back to the 2001 peak.

Last year, healthcare led the state in job creation. At the end of the first quarter, it is projected to be up about 8,800 workers from a year ago.

The good news is that the sector has been joined by tourism, the extractive industries, and the Professional Business Services (PBS) sector for job creation. At the end of the first quarter, the three sectors will add 25,000 to 30,000 net jobs.
Colorado is coming off a solid ski season which, in part, has helped push tourism employment higher by about 8,200 jobs. Increased traffic at DIA points to solid growth in the industry. High gas prices may work to Colorado’s benefit, if it incents the state’s regional market to enjoy less expensive drive vacations to the state this summer.

The extractive industries comprise a small, but important sector because of the severance taxes  generated and jobs added in other industries. Year-over-year the sector is about 2,100 workers ahead of the same period last year. Sustained growth is likely to continue, particularly if the Niobrara oil patch proves to be a worthy producer.

The PBS sector has added about 8,200 workers over the past year. It is a mixed blessing that more than 40% of that increase is derived from Employment Services, i.e. temporary help. While these are typically not high paying jobs, gains in this subsector often point to expansion of other areas.

While the state may be at three years from recovering all the jobs lost in the Great Recession, we are finally on the path to that recovery. Sustainable growth, at some level, is on tap for Colorado.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Risks to Recovery from Great Recession

horvath Leave a comment

The recovery from the Great Recession has now been in place in Colorado for about a year! Spin-masters have labeled the expansion as moderate, manageable, and modest. More accurately, the return to positive territory is less than robust, it is well below average, it is fragile, but it is gaining momentum.

Putting the Thesaurus aside, it is great to again report that job growth is positive. Year-over-year Q1 2011 wage and salary employment is likely to be about 15,000 jobs greater than a year ago.

While there is reason for optimism, the following risks have the ability to derail the expansion, or at least reduce its strength.

• Nationally, Q1 manufacturing employment is about 185,000 net jobs ahead of the same period last year. While the nation added jobs, Colorado manufacturers had mixed results and the bottom line was continued jobs losses for the year. Colorado’s woes are likely to continue as manufacturers post another loss in Q1.

• The story in the construction sector has a similar ring to it. Other states have begun their recovery, yet Q1 Colorado construction employment will drop to levels last seen in the mid-1990s. Although the number of single-family permits is expected to increase this year, Q1 Colorado construction employment will be about 7,000 lower than last year.

• Between February, 2006 and February, 2008, the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices for Colorado housing prices declined by about 12%. In 2009, they regained about half their losses before leveling off. This has an impact on individual homeowners who may be under water or forced to sell for other reasons. As well, the coffers of local municipalities will see flat or reduced revenue streams because property values have not increased.

• Between 2000 and 2010 inflation rose by an annualized rate of 1.6% (Denver-Boulder-Greeley CPI). Looking more closely, this rate is deceptively low. For the period mentioned, the annualized rate of growth for the following categories has been:
o Fuel 5.6%
o Electricity 3.9%
o Medical 3.9%
o Recreation 3.0%
o Natural gas 1.9%
Housing, the dominant component of the headline indicator, came in at 1.3%. For some families, price increases at these levels are an inconvenience, while for others they are problematic.

• Job creation is critical! Net changes in employment are the difference between gross job gains and gross jobs losses. Average quarterly job gains have been fairly constant for the upturns as well as the downturns during the past two decades. On the other hand, fluctuations in average quarterly job losses has been more volatile. In simplistic terms, the changes in net employment have usually been determined by the levels of job losses, rather than the levels of job gains. While this sounds very intuitive, the creation of jobs is clearly much more difficult than it sounds!

• There are external factors such as the triple disaster in Japan; the disruptions in Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Ivory Coast, and Syria; and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The former will clearly be distractions, but they will likely have minor short-term impacts on the U.S. economy.

• Debt!

• President Obama introduced a final possible deterrent to the economy when he announced that he is running for re-election. This is not intended to be a political statement for or against the President, rather an observation that election campaigns, particularly those that are bitterly fought, often put the economy in a holding pattern.

These are significant risks! At the same time, there is reason to be optimistic. The upside will be examined in an upcoming post.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

The Lost Decade – Colorado Sheds A Quarter Million Jobs As a Result of Recessions

horvath Leave a comment

This topic is being revisited (last discussed October 1, 2010). In early March, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released benchmark revisions for the Current Employment Statistics (CES) series for 2009 and 2010.

The Lost Decade (January 2001 through December, 2010)

  • Two recessions
  • 69 months of job gains
  • 51 months of job losses
  • Net loss 28,800 jobs over ten years

Now that the revised data is in, the employment pattern for the 10 years ending this past December is clear: DOWN, UP, DOWN, UP.

The recession, as defined by NBER, is irrelevant.

DOWN

The employment situation started off bad in January 2001. And it stayed bad for 30 months (this includes the 2001 recession).

NOTE: More jobs were lost in the 22 months in the months before and after the recession, as defined by NBER than during the 8 months of the recession (March through October 2001).

Net job losses (from peak to trough) -103,600.

UP

Beginning in July 2003, employment turned positive. Steady gains occurred over the next 58 months.

NOTE: Colorado was late entering the Great Recession (December 2007 through May 2009). The state posted net job gains of 11,600 during the first 5 months.

Net job gains (from trough to peak) +214,900.

DOWN

NOTE: During the last 13 months of the Great Recession, the state lost 109,500 net jobs.

The trend of monthly losses began in May 2008 and continued for 21 months, 8 months past the end of the recession.

Net job losses (from peak to trough) –151,100.

UP

Employment turned positive in February 2010 and posted slight gains for the remaining 11 months in 2010.

Net job gains (from trough to peak) +10,900.

NET LOSS 28,900 JOBS FOR THE TEN YEARS 2001 through 2010!

 

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Has the Colorado Job Creation Machine Stalled?

horvath Leave a comment

Most analyses of Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) employment data report net change in the number of workers. For example, Colorado lost about 25,000 jobs in 2010.

BLS also produces data series, based on the Quarterly Census of Employment (QCEW – private sector only), that report the following employment flows:
• employees added (establishments were opened); in 2009 this total was 101,869.
• workers added (firms currently in business); in 2009 this total was 369,773.
• employees lost (establishments contracted); in 2009 this total was 472,895.
• workers lost (firms closed); in 2009 this total was 111,574.
The sum of the first two categories measures gross job gains, whereas the sum of the latter two categories is gross job losses. In 2009 there was a gross gain of 471,642 jobs and a gross loss of 584,469 jobs.

The net change in employment is the difference between job gains and job losses. In 2009 the net change in employment was -112,827 workers. Total QCEW private employment for 2009 was 1,828,955 workers.

The magnitude of the net jobs lost is striking. It is a result of reduced job creation and increased job losses – the perfect storm on steroids. It should also be noted that in both 2008 and 2009 more jobs were lost by firms closings than were added by firms that were opened.

The following points stand out in an analysis of the jobs gained and jobs lost data:
• During the “go-go 90s” there was a high level of gross jobs lost and an even higher level of gross jobs added. There was a high level of job churn accompanied by strong net gains in employment.
• For the period 2002 through 2004, weak gross job gains were offset by much stronger gross job losses. There were net job losses of about 50,000 workers for this period.
• Gross job gains were comparatively weak for 2006 through 2008, although the state added about 170,000 net jobs over that period. There was a net increase in employment because of a decline in the number of gross jobs lost. In other words, job churn subsided. Workers were content to stay in the jobs they held at the time and fewer jobs were created, which increased competition for the available openings.
• It is especially disturbing to see the decline in the number of employees working for firms that were opened.
At this point, data for 2010 is available through mid-year. The good news is that there seems to be significant improvement in the number of gross jobs lost. On the downside, there is not corresponding improvement in the number of gross jobs gained.

For the moment it appears that Colorado’s wild-west entrepreneurial job creation machine seems to have stalled!

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Lack of Small Business Growth Holding Back Recovery

horvath Leave a comment

The National Federation of Independent Business  survey results for February 2011 provide mixed signs about the economic recovery. Although the NFIB Index of Small Business Optimism posted a slight gain in January, the magnitude of this increase was not significant.

On a positive note, the 4th quarter GDP recorded growth of 3.2% and consumer spending was up 4.4%. While the upward movement of these indicators is good news, it does not reflect the considerable challenges facing many small business owners.

Key findings from the February survey were:
• Sales were improved.
• The outlook for sales is more optimistic.
• Inventories are higher, a sign of better things to come.
• Firms have become more confident about raising prices.
• Price increases must be dealt with delicately in the near-term.
• Fears of deflation have eased.
• The outlook for profits is brighter; however, small businesses are not enjoying the same growth as large businesses.
• Many small businesses are not in a strong enough position to support moderate hiring and capital spending.
• Almost all firms felt their credit needs were met or that they were not interested in borrowing.

Finally, survey respondents identified their single most important problem (see table below). As has been the case throughout the recession, the lack of sales, i.e. weak consumer activity, continues to be at the top of the list. Taxes and government red tape follow in the second and third position.

The lack of growth of our country’s small businesses is one reason why this recovery has been so slow and painful. Looking ahead, significant growth of the country’s small businesses is necessary for the U.S. to reach pre-recession employment levels.

To download the full report go to http://www.nfib.com/research-foundation .

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

Colorado’s Bottom-Up Economic Development Strategy

horvath Leave a comment

The first week in February Governor Hickenlooper (call me “John”) hosted the ninth stop in his Bottom-Up Economic Development tour across Colorado. For about two hours, the region’s top economic developers discussed job creation, economic development, and steps for increasing government efficiencies.

The most frequently discussed topic was transportation and the top priority was to complete FasTracks in a timely and cost effective manner. In addition leaders made a case for completion of the final leg of the beltway (between Broomfield and Golden) around the city, expansion of commercial air, maintenance of our bridges and highways, and reduction of congestion along I-70 into ski country.

Panelists felt that innovation and the attraction/retention of primary jobs was critical if we are to maintain our regional and national competitiveness. They also cited the need to have a well-trained workforce and an efficient, accountable, and adequately funded education system. As well, it is imperative that Coloradans work together to maintain the quality of life that makes the state so attractive. This will require leaders to address issues related to our water supplies, develop parks and recreation areas, invest in infrastructure, and utilize the state’s unique assets to attract commerce.

The metro area’s economic diversity was evident as leaders spoke in support of industries and clusters endemic to their region. For example, they addressed the need for the state to be more “military-friendly”, consider construction of nuclear power plants, understand the importance of refineries, realize the value of our construction and extractive industries, and support gaming and tourism.

As the Bottom-Up discussions continue, it would be beneficial to reflect on past economic-development successes. For example, consider the public-private partnership, the former Colorado Advanced Technology Institute (CATI). During the late 1980s, CATI was established to guide the development of science and technology and the growth of select high-tech clusters. Specifically, the group’s work laid the groundwork for the state’s photonics, materials, hardware, software, telecommunications, and bioscience clusters. While it may not be appropriate to resurrect CATI as it existed, there is merit in having the an organization that would fill many of CATI’s roles in fostering long-term growth.

Four years ago, a state job cabinet was formed, town meetings were held across the state to gather input, and plans were put in place. While that effort was well intended, it did not have the desired impact. Hopefully this Bottom-Up Planning approach with be more successful.

A well-thought out economic development plan couldn’t come at a better time. Colorado employment remains below the 2001 peak and it will be years before state payrolls return to the pre-Great Recession high mark.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.

The Colorado Budget Challenge 2011 – Where to Cut?

horvath Leave a comment

For the next two months Colorado legislators will be dealing with the two-edged sword known as the balanced budget amendment.

During lean fiscal times, the amendment forces state senators and representatives to make difficult choices in this zero sum game. They have been faced with similar challenges since 2001 as growth in General Funds Revenue has not kept pace with increased demand for services.

For example, if you were a legislator, which of the following would you eliminate or reduce funding for?
• Social Service – Would you reduce or eliminate funding for single moms and lower income individuals to help them defer transportation costs so they can travel to work?
• Economic Development – Would you reduce or eliminate an incentive program that would retain or bring jobs to Colorado, foster growth in state output, and generate revenue for government entities?
• Health Care – Would you cut back or eliminate funding for a health-care program that would reduce services to elderly? The reduction in state funding would also decrease federal funding by a similar amount.  It is a tough time to be a state legislator.

On a positive note, the balanced-budget amendment means that Colorado is not having to borrow money from the Federal government to continue basic operations.

The table below, highlights the source and magnitude of the challenges facing the state government as it is forced to deal with increased demand and reduced revenue. The table compares key data sets for 2001 and 2009. Highlights of the table are:
• The Colorado population increased by about 700,000 people.
• K-12 enrollment is up 76,000 students.
• Despite tuition increases, enrollment at the state’s colleges and universities has grown by more than 21,000 students.
• The prison population is up by about 6,000 inmates.
• The number of Medicaid recipients almost doubled, up 226,000.
• Employment levels were very volatile. The 2009 average was only slightly higher than the 2001 average.
• General fund revenues remained virtually flat (not inflation adjusted).
• Growth of general funds will be constrained by the severity of the Great Recession.

Clearly, the state does not have a stable fiscal model for being competitive in the global economy. The rough ride will continue well into the future.

©Copyright 2011 by CBER.