Economic growth Archives - Page 5 of 9 - Colorado-based Business and Economic Research

Occupy the Labor Market – Shields Foretells Growth in Northern Colorado

March 5, 2012March 5, 2012 horvath Leave a comment

In January, Dr. Martin Shields, CSU economics professor, produced his business and economic forecast for the Northern Colorado Business Review. In short, Shields pointed out that the U.S. will see a lackluster recovery that will be driven by national and international events (debt, war, oil prices, political crises, etc.)

At the national level, Shields emphasized three points:
• “Tepid and sustained” Real GDP growth.
• The decline in unemployment will be slow as the median number of weeks that workers are unemployed remains high, based on the slow rate at which jobs are being created.
• Core inflation has returned to pre-recession levels.

The Northern Colorado economy will continue to be a mixed bag, although it has been a leader in the recovery. It is expected to continue in that role. Nevertheless, unemployment will be high by historical standards. Locals have struggled with the decline in real household income, a challenge that is likely to continue in the months ahead.

Shields also emphasized the following:
• Northern Colorado lost 5,900 jobs over the past 3 years.
• On a positive note, the region added 1,900 jobs in the past year.
• Since 2008 the number of unemployed workers in the region has increased by 6,700.
• Larimer and Weld County have performed differently during the Great Recession.
o Larimer’s labor market has been stronger
o Median household income in Larimer has declined.
o Weld County household income has remained flat.
• FFHA data shows that housing prices are stagnant.
• While it is encouraging that there is an uptick in housing starts, it must be noted that the increase is small and it is from a very low base.

Looking ahead, Shields foretells continued growth in 2012.
• The unemployment rate might approach 5.0% in Larimer County.
• In Weld County, unemployment might fall below 8.0%.
• Between 2,700 and 3,300 workers might be added to local payrolls.
The Government, Information, and Financial Activities sectors will struggle, while the energy, food manufacturing, health care, and professional business services sectors will continue to grow.

Shields heavily emphasized the term “might” in each of his projections. In closing he stated that the real challenge will be to add jobs that pay good wages.

Where are all the Startups? – Survival Rates on Downward Path

February 27, 2012February 27, 2012 horvath Leave a comment

The U.S. and Colorado have experienced volatile economic conditions for about 20 years. There was strong growth during the go-go 1990s, follow by two major recessions during the Lost Decade. Startups play an important role in any economy, but until recently there has been little data to understand their performance. This brief analysis uses BLS data and assumes that startups are less than one-year in age and have employees.

The following are the most frequent questions asked about survival rates for startups.
• Are the rates different based on the number of years the firms have been in existence?
• Are the rates different based on when the firm was started?
• How have the rates changed over time?
The answers are explained and can be observed below.

The first question is the easiest to answer – survival rates are lower for longer periods of time.
• The range for two-year rates was 60.9% to 68.9%.
• The range for five year rates was 43.7% to 50.7%.
• The range for eight-year rates was 33.4% to 39.7%.

A partial answer can be given to the second question. Data is available for different time frames (16 years for two-year rates, 13 years for five-year rates, and 10 years for eight-year rates). For the 10-year period that is common to all three rates, the lowest rates occurred in 2001.

The 2-year survival rate was 61.6% in 2001 and 60.9% in 2008. Based on the current trends, the lowest 5-year and 8 -year rates are likely to occur in 2008. This coincides with the low points in the business cycle.

The answer to the final question is simple – survival rates have declined over time.
• The 2-year rates began declining in 1999, posted a slight increase in 2002, declined in 2006 and rebounded in 2009.
• The 5-year rates showed a steady decline beginning in 1995. There was an uptick in 2002 and 2003, but the downward trend reappeared in 2004.
• The 8-year rates showed a downward trend beginning in 1995. There was slight upward movement in 2002 and 2003.
As mentioned above, these changes have coincided with the business cycle; however, over time they are trending downward.

Are there policy decisions that could reverse this downward path? Is this downward trend a function of the quality of teaching in colleges and universities? Are the multitude of higher education entrepreneurial centers that have been started over the past two decade having a positive impact? Is this trend a function of poor service from government programs such as the Small Business Development Centers or the Small Business Administration? Have the banks failed to properly fund the startups? Or would the survival rate have been worse if the university and federal government programs weren’t in place? Or is this downward trend simply a function of ten-years of annualized Real GDP growth of 1.6%.

Startups are an important part of the economy. When data becomes available for 2010 and beyond (several years from now), hopefully it will be possible to look back and see that the downward trend has reversed.

For additional information on startups and job creation go to https://cber.co/ or the report “Where Are All the Startups?”

The Mismatch of Skills between Company Needs and the Unemployed

February 21, 2012February 21, 2012 horvath Leave a comment

It is an understatement to say that there is a mismatch of skills between the unemployed and the needs of the companies looking for workers.

There are 2.1 million unemployed workers in occupations with unemployment rates below the natural rate (4.5% to 5.0%). Many of these occupations require a college degree. These occupations account for 31% of total U.S. workers.

There are 4.3 million unemployed workers in occupations with unemployment rates between the natural rate (4.5% to 5.0%) and below the U.S. average. These occupations account for 38% of total U.S. workers.

There are 6.0 million unemployed workers in occupations with unemployment rates above the U.S. average. These occupations account for 31% of total U.S. workers.

The bottom line is there are 10 million workers competing for replacement jobs in their occupations. As well, they are part of the pool who are competing for the handful of jobs in industries where they are not qualified.

It is clear why the unemployment rate has taken so long to return to the “natural rate” and it is easy to prepare the chart that illustrates the challenge.

What is the remedy?

Where are all the Startups? – Jobs Created Have Increased at a Declining Rate Since 1999

February 15, 2012February 15, 2012 horvath Leave a comment

Startups, entrepreneurs, and small businesses have been the focal point of discussions about how the U.S. and Colorado will fully recover from the 2007 recession. As part of this dialogue, there is a wealth of information and misinformation about the importance of these businesses to the economy.

So what do the numbers say?

The first step in analyzing the growth of startups is to define them. The second step is to find a data set that tracks changes based on that definition.

There are many ways to define an entrepreneurial business venture or a startup company that include:
• No formal structure.
• Type – Sole proprietorships or LLCs.
• Funding – Microenterprises.
• Size – A company with 1-4 employees.
• Age – A company less than 1 year in age with employees.

For purposes of this discussion, startups will be defined as firms less than one-year in age that have employees. By definition, sole proprietorships, microenterprises, or LLCs may be included if they meet these criteria. The Bureau of Labor Statistics produces data about startups defined in this manner. BLS reports the number of firms and employees based on a year ending on March 31. For example, 1994 data includes startups for the period April 1993 through March 1994.

A review of the data shows the number of jobs created at startups has increased at a declining rate since 1999 for both Colorado and the U.S.

In 1999, 94,100 jobs were created at Colorado startups. That number decreased every year through 2010. That year the new group of startups created only 47,100 jobs. A slight increase was posted in 2011.

A similar pattern occurred at the national level. In 1999, 4,703,000 employees worked at U.S. companies started that year. By 2010, the number of employees working at companies that began operations that year had fallen to 2,457,000. A slight increase was recorded in 2011.

Colorado has a track record for having world renowned startups. Clearly good things have come from Colorado entrepreneurs and startup companies; however, by this definition, Colorado may not be the entrepreneurial Mecca that we are led to believe.

For additional information on startups and job creation go to https://cber.co/ or the report “Where Are All the Startups?”

Conference Board Points to Slower Growth in 2012

January 29, 2012January 29, 2012 horvath Leave a comment

Over the past 18 months, The Conference Board has provided a depressing, but accurate assessment (unfortunately) of the performance of the U.S. and global economies. Overall TCB points to slower growth in the world economy in 3.2% in 2012 vs. 3.6% in 2011.

TCB divides countries into two groups – advanced and emerging. The U.S., Japan, and the E.U. 15 are the major players in the advanced group. The emerging group includes China, India, the remaining Asian countries, Latin American, Middle East, Africa, Russia and other CIS countries, and Central and Eastern Europe. The advanced economies account for 50.3% of global output and the emerging economies are responsible for the remainder, 49.7%.

In 2012 the advanced regions are expected to expand by 1.1%, whereas the emerging countries, will post a much stronger gain, 5.1%. TCB feels that parts of Europe are in a recession. The depth of that recession is likely to be determined by the magnitude of their debt crisis.

Japan is the only region that is showing an increase in the rate of output for 2012. As they recover from the tsunami and power plant tragedy that occurred last year, they will experience minimal growth of 0.7% in 2012. In 2011, their output posted a change of -0.5%.

About 22% of U.S. exports go to Europe. As well, Europe provides about half of the income earned abroad for U.S. multinational companies. A decrease in European demand could lower the rate of U.S. GDP growth and the strength of our economy. On the other hand opportunity exists for American companies exporting goods and services to the emerging economies.

Despite this dismal outlook, the U.S. posted job gains of 200,000 in December 2011. Time will tell if this increase is an anomaly, based on TCB’s dismal outlook or if we will look back to December and see it as a turnaround point for sustained U.S. growth at a higher rate.

Colorado Economic Forecast – Challenges (Demand and Debt)

January 10, 2012January 10, 2012 horvath Leave a comment

Colorado will experience below average growth for another year. Cber.co is projecting that U.S. real GDP growth will be 2.1% to 2.5% in 2012, with employment growth of 27,500 to 37,500 in Colorado. For more details about the Cber.co 2012 Economic Forecast, click here.

There are a myriad of challenges facing the Colorado and U.S. economies in 2012. Some of the key questions relating to these challenges can be grouped into the following categories:
• Demand for goods and services;
• Debt, the financial system, and politics;
• Education and workforce; and
• Industry and cluster issues.
This post raises questions about demand for goods and services; and debt, the financial system, and politics. The topics of education and workforce and industry issues will be discussed in the post dated January 16th.

Demand for Goods and Services
• Will there be sufficient demand for goods and services given the high unemployment rate and minimal wage increases?
• Will companies be able to pass on increased input costs to customers and maintain demand?
• How much longer can manufacturing shipments and output increase without adding to their workforce?
• There is an apparent lack of new firm creation. Is this caused by a lack of demand or insufficient innovation?
• What is being done to protect and encourage innovation?
• For the most part, companies have adequate access to capital. Do they know how to access it? When will there be enough demand for them to need additional capital?

Debt, the Financial System, and Politics
• Europe is a major trading partner for Colorado. How will the EU debt crisis impact the U.S. and the state?
• Worldwide there are countries other than Greece and Italy with public and private debt issues. Is anyone paying attention?
• Are our leaders paying attention to both the public and private debt crisis in the United States?
• Is the U.S. financial system sufficiently stable?
• How much uncertainty will be caused by the upcoming elections?
• Will politicians be able to instill confidence in the government after the elections?

Colorado will face these and other challenges in 2012. It will be interesting to look back a year from now and see how these issues unfolded and how state public and private leaders addressed them.

Cber.co Colorado Economic Forecast 2012 – Continued Improvement

December 23, 2011December 23, 2011 horvath Leave a comment

The economy is fragile and there are a number of variables that could alter any forecast. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, 2012 will look a lot like 2011. Colorado will experience below average growth for another year. Cber.co is projecting that we will see real GDP growth of 2.1% to 2.5% in 2012, with employment growth of 27,500 to 37,500 in Colorado. Go to Cber.co for the 2012 Colorado Economic Forecast.

The sectors of the economy can be evaluated in three groups: solid growth, limited growth, and volatile growth. A summary of these analyses for each of the groups follows.

Solid Growth Sectors (About 41% of total employment)

These sectors posted stronger growth in 2011 than any time in the past two decades. Growth will taper off slightly 2012 with the addition of at least 1,500 jobs in each of the following sectors.

Tourism
Private Education and Health Care
Professional and Scientific
Extractive Industries
Wholesale Trade
Employment Services
Higher Education

In total, these sectors will add 26,500 to 32,500 net jobs in 2012.

Limited Growth Sectors (about 26% of total employment)

In 2011 these sectors individually recorded minimal change in their number of employees. Significant change is unlikely in a slow economy.

Personal (Other) Services
Utilities
Retail Trade
Corporate Headquarters (MCE)
State (Not Higher Education)
Manufacturing
Transportation & Warehousing

Combined, these sectors will add 3,000 to 9,000 net jobs.

Volatile Growth Sectors (33% of total employment)
These sectors have either bottomed out, are near the bottom, or have turned the corner. Combined they will shed fewer jobs than in 2011.

Construction
Financial Activities
Information
Federal Government
B-to-B (Not Employment Services)
Local Government (Not K-12)
K-12 Education

Combined, there will be a change of -6,000 to 0 net jobs.

2012 Employment Outlook

Because the economy is still not on a solid foundation, it is reasonable to provide three scenarios for the summation of the above groups: optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic.

Optimistic Scenario
U.S. Real GDP 2.6%+
More than 37,500 Colorado Workers or More

Most Likely Scenario
U.S. Real GDP 2.1 % to 2.5%
+ 27,500 to 37,500 Colorado Workers

Pessimistic Scenario
U.S. Real GDP 1.6% to 2.0%
Less that 27,500 Colorado Workers

If probabilities were to be assigned to each of these scenarios, they would be as follows:
Most Likely 55%
Pessimistic 25%
Optimistic 20%.
At the time the forecast for 2012 was prepared, there was slightly more downside risk.

Leeds School Annual Forecast Calls For Slowdown in Colorado Employment Growth

December 5, 2011December 5, 2011 horvath Leave a comment

The Leeds School of Business released its 47th annual business forecast, calling for the U.S. economy to grow at a faster rate and a modest slowdown in the growth rate of the state economy in 2012. The report projected a sharp increase in U.S. Real GDP growth, from 1.8% to 2.4%. Surprisingly that gain translates into an increase of only 23,000 workers in Colorado. This follows on the heels of job gains of 27,500 in 2011.

Job losses are projected for the Manufacturing, Information, and Financial Activities sector. After manufacturing gains in 2011, it is disappointing to see the projected return to negative growth. Evidently renewable energy, which sparked manufacturing growth in 2011, will either flatten or taper off in 2012. Consolidation in the other two sectors will drive further cutbacks.

According to the Leeds School, 2012 growth will be driven by the Health Care and Professional Business Services sectors. Smaller gains will occur in tourism and construction. It is encouraging to see the Construction sector on the positive side of the ledger again.

Although, the 2011 preliminary employment estimates will not be updated until March 2013; the Leeds estimate of 27,500 additional jobs is reasonable. In evaluating their projections for 2012, it is interesting to see how they fared with their 2011 forecast.

1. The Forum (UCCS) error -2,500
25,000 jobs (10/2/2010).

2. OSPB error -3,200
24,300 jobs (12/2010).

3. BBVA Compass error -5,500
22,000 jobs

4. (tie). Legislative Council error -7,500
19,900 jobs (12/2010).

4. (tie). BBER error -7,500
(15,000 to 24,999) (10/2010).

4. (tie) Jeff Thredgold’s Small Business Index error +7,500
(33,000+) (Autumn 2010).

7. CSU Economics Class error – 8,500
19,000 jobs (11/16/2010).

8. CU Colorado BEOF error -17,400
10,100 jobs (12/6/2010).

9. Demographer’s Office error -27,500
No growth (11/5/2010).

10. Moody’s/Dismal.com error +28,500
56,000 jobs (3/2011).

Like most forecasts, the Leeds projections have historically understated periods of growth and decline. If the Leeds pattern of error continues in 2012, then job gains above 30,000 might be more realistic. For additional information on forecast accuracy click here.

Sectors Losing Jobs Have Higher Wages

October 2, 2011October 2, 2011 horvath Leave a comment

Through the first 8 months of the year there are 7 sectors of the economy that have lost a net total of 25,100 jobs, compared to the same period last year.

Construction                                     -8,800
Financial Activities                            -4,200
Federal Government                         -3,400
Information                                       -3,400
B-to-B (Not Employment Services)  -2,600
Local Government (Not K-12)         -1,600
K-12 Education                               -1,100

These sectors account for 33.3% of total employment. Average wages for this mix of workers is about $56,600 compared to average annual wages for all employees of about $47,900 (calculations based on 2010 QCEW data). In other words, the average wages for the sectors that are losing jobs is significantly greater than the overall state average, based on 2010 data.

The 2011 prognosis is that each of these sectors will show job losses for the year (2011) and that average annual wages for the group will remain well above the overall state average.

For a comprehensive review of the Colorado economy visit the CBER website.

After 8 Months, 7 Sectors Show Job Gains

September 26, 2011May 20, 2014 horvath Leave a comment

Through the first 8 months of the year there are 7 sectors of the economy that have added a net total of 34,900 jobs, compared to the same period last year.

Tourism +11,600
Private Education and Health Care +9,600
Professional and Scientific +4,100
Extractive Industries +3,000
Wholesale Trade +2,300
Employment Services +2,300
Higher Education +1,900

These sectors account for 40.6% of total employment. Average wages for this mix of workers is about $43,600 per worker, compared to average annual wages for all workers of about $47,900 (calculations based on 2010 QCEW data). In other words, the average wages for the sectors that are adding jobs is less than the overall state average.

The 2011 prognosis is that each of these sectors will show job gains for the year (2011) and that average annual wages for the group will be less than the overall state average. For a more comprehensive review of the Colorado economy visit the CBER website.